BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

704 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18423516)

  • 1. Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents.
    Haberkamp J; Ernst M; Böckelmann U; Szewzyk U; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3153-61. PubMed ID: 18423516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behaviour in ultrafiltration.
    Haberkamp J; Ruhl AS; Ernst M; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3794-802. PubMed ID: 17585987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification and quantification of major organic foulants in treated domestic wastewater affecting filterability in dead-end ultrafiltration.
    Zheng X; Ernst M; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2009 Jan; 43(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 18986670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the size of membrane foulants on the filterability of WWTP-effluent.
    Poele St; Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):111-8. PubMed ID: 15686010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.
    Huang H; Lee N; Young T; Gary A; Lozier JC; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3823-32. PubMed ID: 17644151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of hydraulic retention time on UASB post-treatment with UF membranes.
    Salazar-Peláez ML; Morgan-Sagastume JM; Noyola A
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(11):2299-305. PubMed ID: 22156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of colloid stability of wastewater treatment plants effluent on nanofiltration performance.
    Schrader GA; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):345-57. PubMed ID: 16459809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
    Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of organic and colloidal fouling on the removal of sulphamethoxazole by nanofiltration membranes.
    Nghiem LD; Espendiller C; Braun G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 18653950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of wastewater effluent organic materials on fouling in ultrafiltration.
    Kim HC; Dempsey BA
    Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3379-84. PubMed ID: 18534655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Membrane filtration of wastewater effluents for reuse: effluent organic matter rejection and fouling.
    Jarusutthirak C; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):225-32. PubMed ID: 11436785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
    Jang NY; Watanabe Y; Minegishi S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter.
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2357-68. PubMed ID: 16777172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
    Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrafiltration/nanofiltration for the tertiary treatment of leather industry effluents.
    Streit KF; Ferreira JZ; Bernardes AM; Norberta De Pinho M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9130-5. PubMed ID: 20000502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.
    Lesjean B; Rosenberger S; Laabs C; Jekel M; Gnirss R; Amy G
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):1-8. PubMed ID: 16003955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biopolymer fouling in dead-end ultrafiltration of treated domestic wastewater.
    Zheng X; Ernst M; Huck PM; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5212-21. PubMed ID: 20637488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New parameter for monitoring fouling during ultrafiltration of WWTP effluent.
    Roorda JH; van der Graaf JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(10):241-8. PubMed ID: 11436787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration using model organic compounds.
    Kweon JH; Lawler DF
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):101-6. PubMed ID: 16003967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.