236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18423841)
1. Environmental service payments: evaluating biodiversity conservation trade-offs and cost-efficiency in the Osa Conservation Area, Costa Rica.
Barton DN; Faith DP; Rusch GM; Acevedo H; Paniagua L; Castro M
J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):901-11. PubMed ID: 18423841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.
Wunder S
Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 17298510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact.
Sánchez-Azofeifa GA; Pfaff A; Robalino JA; Boomhower JP
Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 17883482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs.
Armsworth PR; Acs S; Dallimer M; Gaston KJ; Hanley N; Wilson P
Ecol Lett; 2012 May; 15(5):406-14. PubMed ID: 22385501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Identification of marine and coastal biodiversity conservation priorities in Costa Rica].
Alvarado JJ; Herrera B; Corrales L; Asch J; Paaby P
Rev Biol Trop; 2011 Jun; 59(2):829-42. PubMed ID: 21721241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa.
Egoh BN; Reyers B; Carwardine J; Bode M; O'Farrell PJ; Wilson KA; Possingham HP; Rouget M; de Lange W; Richardson DM; Cowling RM
Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1021-30. PubMed ID: 20136871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.
Rissman AR; Lozier L; Comendant T; Kareiva P; Kiesecker JM; Shaw MR; Merenlender AM
Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):709-18. PubMed ID: 17531049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.
Chen X; Lupi F; Viña A; He G; Liu J
Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 20586786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baseline assessment for environmental services payments from satellite imagery: a case study from Costa Rica and Mexico.
Kalacska M; Sanchez-Azofeifa GA; Rivard B; Calvo-Alvarado JC; Quesada M
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jul; 88(2):348-59. PubMed ID: 17475393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating the opportunity costs of biodiversity protection in the Brigalow Belt, New South Wales.
Sinden JA
J Environ Manage; 2004 Apr; 70(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 15016443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia.
Jack BK; Leimona B; Ferraro PJ
Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 18983597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ecological efficiency of voluntary conservation of boreal-forest biodiversity.
Mönkkönen M; Ylisirniö AL; Hämäläinen T
Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 18983601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach.
Arponen A; Kondelin H; Moilanen A
Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 17391202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.
Knight AT; Cowling RM; Difford M; Campbell BM
Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1348-58. PubMed ID: 20345404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection.
Perhans K; Kindstrand C; Boman M; Djupström LB; Gustafsson L; Mattsson L; Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Wikberg S
Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18637912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Forest and population at Península de Osa, Costa Rica].
Rosero-Bixby L; Maldonado-Ulloa T; Bonilla-Carrión R
Rev Biol Trop; 2002 Jun; 50(2):585-98. PubMed ID: 12298289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings.
McDonald RI; Yuan-Farrell C; Fievet C; Moeller M; Kareiva P; Foster D; Gragson T; Kinzig A; Kuby L; Redman C
Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1526-36. PubMed ID: 18173476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
