716 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18423977)
1. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 18423977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; van den Bergh RC; Wolters T; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2009 Jan; 55(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 18406045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: the impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics.
Gosselaar C; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; van der Kwast TH; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2007 Feb; 67(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 17044079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).
Roobol MJ; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. PubMed ID: 15134973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only.
Okotie OT; Roehl KA; Han M; Loeb S; Gashti SN; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1117-20. PubMed ID: 18158030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeat prostate biopsy in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Pinsky PF; Crawford ED; Kramer BS; Andriole GL; Gelmann EP; Grubb R; Greenlee R; Gohagan JK
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 17223921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.
Miele ME
Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15625982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial*.
Bokhorst LP; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1654-60. PubMed ID: 23043563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital rectal examination is barrier to population-based prostate cancer screening.
Nagler HM; Gerber EW; Homel P; Wagner JR; Norton J; Lebovitch S; Phillips JL
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1137-40. PubMed ID: 15922431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of different screening tests in predicting prostate biopsy outcome in screening for prostate cancer data from a multicenter study (ERSPC).
Roobol MJ; Zappa M; Määttänen L; Ciatto S
Prostate; 2007 Mar; 67(4):439-46. PubMed ID: 17192912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate cancer screening within a prostate specific antigen range of 3 to 3.9 ng./ml.: a comparison of digital rectal examination and free prostate specific antigen as supplemental screening tests.
Mäkinen T; Tammela TL; Hakama M; Stenman UH; Rannikko S; Aro J; Juusela H; Määttänen L; Auvinen A
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1339-42. PubMed ID: 11547069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screening of cancer of the prostate: study in a Spanish population].
Herrero Payo JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Páez Borda A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Moreno Valle JA; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1996; 49(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 8929102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate-specific antigen velocity at low prostate-specific antigen levels as screening tool for prostate cancer: results of second screening round of ERSPC (ROTTERDAM).
Roobol MJ; Kranse R; de Koning HJ; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. PubMed ID: 14972478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.
Gosselaar C; Kranse R; Roobol MJ; Roemeling S; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2008 Jun; 68(9):985-93. PubMed ID: 18409186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection rate of prostate cancer according to prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in Korean men: a nationwide multicenter study.
Seo HK; Chung MK; Ryu SB; Lee KH;
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1109-12. PubMed ID: 18158028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for prostate cancer.
Pode D; Shapiro A; Lebensart P; Meretyk S; Katz G; Barak V
Isr J Med Sci; 1995; 31(2-3):125-8. PubMed ID: 7538101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC.
Schröder FH; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2008 May; 53(5):901-8. PubMed ID: 18262712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Screening for early detection of prostate cancer (first experience in Israel)].
Neheman A; Shotland Y; Metz Y; Stein A
Harefuah; 2001 Jan; 140(1):4-10, 88, 87. PubMed ID: 11242898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
