These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18424083)
1. Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain. Fuchs S; Andersen SK; Gruber T; Müller MM Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):1086-101. PubMed ID: 18424083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield. Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An independent brain-computer interface using covert non-spatial visual selective attention. Zhang D; Maye A; Gao X; Hong B; Engel AK; Gao S J Neural Eng; 2010 Feb; 7(1):16010. PubMed ID: 20083864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection. Fagioli S; Macaluso E J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention. Müller MM Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time course of affective bias in visual attention: convergent evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials and behavioral data. Hindi Attar C; Andersen SK; Müller MM Neuroimage; 2010 Dec; 53(4):1326-33. PubMed ID: 20615472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time course of competition for visual processing resources between emotional pictures and foreground task. Müller MM; Andersen SK; Keil A Cereb Cortex; 2008 Aug; 18(8):1892-9. PubMed ID: 18063562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality. Talsma D; Doty TJ; Strowd R; Woldorff MG Psychophysiology; 2006 Nov; 43(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 17076810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders. Matthews AJ; Martin FH Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of cannabis use and gender on the visual steady state evoked potential. Skosnik PD; Krishnan GP; Vohs JL; O'Donnell BF Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):144-56. PubMed ID: 16364685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication. Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Jun; 13(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16003896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus specificity of a steady-state visual-evoked potential-based brain-computer interface. Ng KB; Bradley AP; Cunnington R J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036008. PubMed ID: 22589242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing 3D form and 3D motion: respective contributions of attention-based and stimulus-driven activity. Paradis AL; Droulez J; Cornilleau-Pérès V; Poline JB Neuroimage; 2008 Dec; 43(4):736-47. PubMed ID: 18805496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]