615 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18424357)
1. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.
Shao Y; Wang DW; Lu GL; Shen ZJ
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1841-5. PubMed ID: 25822707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Complicated Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi Based on a New Scoring Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
Zhang L; Fei X; Jiang Z; Song Y
J Endourol; 2023 Apr; 37(4):462-466. PubMed ID: 36541344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotomy for large (>15 mm) impacted upper ureteral stones in different locations: is the upper border of the fourth lumbar vertebra a good indication for choice of management method?
Li H; Na W; Li H; Jiang Y; Gu X; Zhang M; Huo W; Kong X
J Endourol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1120-5. PubMed ID: 23514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?
Muslumanoglu AY; Karadag MA; Tefekli AH; Altunrende F; Tok A; Berberoglu Y
Int J Urol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1385-8. PubMed ID: 17083388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi.
Cohen J; Cohen S; Grasso M
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3 Pt B):E127-31. PubMed ID: 22757752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones. A comparative study].
Xue ZY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 29(4):235-7, 271. PubMed ID: 1874112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Chang X; Li J; Han Z
Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(6):902-926. PubMed ID: 32459455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management.
Thomas JC; DeMarco RT; Donohoe JM; Adams MC; Brock JW; Pope JC
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1072-4. PubMed ID: 16094060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Zhong B; Yang X; Wang G; Hou P; Meng J
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 28662708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
