These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1842465)
1. A new approach to a damage risk criterion for weapons impulses. Price GR; Kalb JT Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():21-37. PubMed ID: 1842465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the auditory hazard assessment algorithm for the human with impulse noise data. Price GR J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2786-802. PubMed ID: 18189569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Firing recoilless weapons from enclosures. Price GR Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():39-48. PubMed ID: 1842466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise. Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions. Marshall L; Lapsley Miller JA; Heller LM; Wolgemuth KS; Hughes LM; Smith SD; Kopke RD J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):995-1013. PubMed ID: 19206875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impulse noise influence on hearing]. Konopka W; Olszewski J; Pietkiewicz P; Mielczarek M Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Sep; 19(111):296-7. PubMed ID: 16358848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insights into hazard from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. Price GR; Kalb JT J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 1880292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endogenous factors related to susceptibility to damage from noise. Ward WD Occup Med; 1995; 10(3):561-75. PubMed ID: 8578419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military. Pelausa EO; Abel SM; Simard J; Dempsey I J Otolaryngol; 1995 Oct; 24(5):271-80. PubMed ID: 8537985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure]. Plinkert PK; Hemmert W; Zenner HP HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rating the hazard from intense sounds: putting theory into practice. Price GR Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():111-22. PubMed ID: 6962505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among military pilots. Kuronen P; Toppila E; Starck J; Pääkkönen R; Sorri MJ Int J Audiol; 2004 Feb; 43(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 15035560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specific features of military low-altitude flight noise: criteria for risk of damage and physiological effects. Spreng M Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1993; 88():271-87. PubMed ID: 8460370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blast criteria for open spaces and enclosures. Richmond DR Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():49-76. PubMed ID: 1842467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impulse noise - measurement and assessment of the risk of noise induced hearing loss. Voigt P; Godenhielm B; Ostlund E Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):319-25. PubMed ID: 6939103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiometric surveillance of soldiers during shooting light and heavy weapons with different hearing protection. Dancer A; Buck K Scand Audiol Suppl; 1991; 34():157. PubMed ID: 1842462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]