138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18425245)
1. Facial dimensions, bite force and masticatory muscle thickness in preschool children with functional posterior crossbite.
Castelo PM; Bonjardim LR; Pereira LJ; Gavião MB
Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18425245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite.
Castelo PM; Gavião MB; Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 17317862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in bite force, masticatory muscle thickness, and facial morphology between primary and mixed dentition in preschool children with normal occlusion.
Castelo PM; Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR; Gavião MB
Ann Anat; 2010 Feb; 192(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 19914813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of facial asymmetry and masticatory muscle thickness in children with normal occlusion and functional posterior crossbite.
Castelo PM; Pereira LJ; Andrade AS; Marquezin MC; Gavião MB
Minerva Stomatol; 2010; 59(7-8):423-30. PubMed ID: 20842080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximal bite force, facial morphology and sucking habits in young children with functional posterior crossbite.
Castelo PM; Gavião MB; Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 20485925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of changes in muscle thickness, bite force and facial asymmetry during early treatment of functional posterior crossbite.
Castelo PM; Gavião MB; Pereira LJ; Bonjardim LR
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20831143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics.
Hannam AG; Wood WW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Dec; 80(4):429-45. PubMed ID: 2603948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bite force in pre-orthodontic children with unilateral crossbite.
Sonnesen L; Bakke M; Solow B
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 23(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 11890069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electromyographic activity and thickness of masticatory muscles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite.
Andrade AS; Gavião MB; Derossi M; Gameiro GH
Clin Anat; 2009 Mar; 22(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 19031391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Pereira LJ; Gavião MB; Bonjardim LR; Castelo PM; van der Bilt A
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17290018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude.
Raadsheer MC; van Eijden TM; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
J Dent Res; 1999 Jan; 78(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 10065943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive value of masseter muscle thickness and bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment: a prospective controlled study.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 25582592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness.
Palinkas M; Nassar MS; Cecílio FA; Siéssere S; Semprini M; Machado-de-Sousa JP; Hallak JE; Regalo SC
Arch Oral Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(10):797-802. PubMed ID: 20667521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology.
Raadsheer MC; Kiliaridis S; Van Eijden TM; Van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8771323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bite force and its association with stability following Class II/1 functional appliance treatment.
Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 22828079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study.
Kiliaridis S; Kjellberg H; Wenneberg B; Engström C
Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Oct; 51(5):323-31. PubMed ID: 8279273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships between craniofacial morphology and masticatory muscle activity during isometric contraction at different interocclusal distances.
Takeuchi-Sato T; Arima T; Mew M; Svensson P
Arch Oral Biol; 2019 Feb; 98():52-60. PubMed ID: 30448395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of gender, facial dimensions, body mass index and type of functional occlusion on bite force.
Koç D; Doğan A; Bek B
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 21625746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interrelation between occlusal findings and orofacial myofunctional status in primary and mixed dentition: Part III: Interrelation between malocclusions and orofacial dysfunctions.
Grabowski R; Kundt G; Stahl F
J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Nov; 68(6):462-76. PubMed ID: 18034287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
