444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18425544)
1. Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Soto JA
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 18425544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT.
Anderson SW; Rho E; Soto JA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 18372450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pancreas divisum: depiction with multi-detector row CT.
Soto JA; Lucey BC; Stuhlfaut JW
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):503-8. PubMed ID: 15770038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections.
Raptopoulos V; Prassopoulos P; Chuttani R; McNicholas MM; McKee JD; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 9577475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidetector-row computed tomography (CT) of blunt pancreatic injuries: can contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT detect pancreatic duct injuries?
Wong YC; Wang LJ; Fang JF; Lin BC; Ng CJ; Chen RJ
J Trauma; 2008 Mar; 64(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 18332806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique.
Soto JA; Barish MA; Yucel EK; Clarke P; Siegenberg D; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 7617861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of cystic tumor of the pancreas compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and computed tomography.
Mera K; Tajiri H; Muto M; Ohtsu A; Furuse J; Maru Y; Kinoshita T; Ryu M; Nawano S; Murakami K; Moriyama N; Yoshida S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Jun; 29(6):294-8. PubMed ID: 10418558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital.
Rahman R; Ju J; Shamma's J; Goebel S; Sundaram U
W V Med J; 2010; 106(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 21739880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: multi-detector row CT with 2D curved reformations--correlation with MRCP.
Sahani DV; Kadavigere R; Blake M; Fernandez-Del Castillo C; Lauwers GY; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):560-9. PubMed ID: 16436817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Pancreas divisum: Diagnostic importance of MR cholangiopancreatography].
Yağmurlu B; Erden A; Erden I
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Sep; 9(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 14661601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Neitlich JD; Topazian M; Smith RC; Gupta A; Burrell MI; Rosenfield AT
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 9169700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreas divisum: a tertiary center experience.
Kushnir VM; Wani SB; Fowler K; Menias C; Varma R; Narra V; Hovis C; Murad FM; Mullady DK; Jonnalagadda SS; Early DS; Edmundowicz SA; Azar RR
Pancreas; 2013 Apr; 42(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 23211370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Magnetic resonance tomography of biliary and pancreatic ducts].
Tennøe B; Stiris MG; Dullerud R; Lunde OC; Aadland E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3252-6. PubMed ID: 10533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.
Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pancreatic duct strictures: identifying risk of malignancy.
Kalady MF; Peterson B; Baillie J; Onaitis MW; Abdul-Wahab OI; Howden JK; Jowell PS; Branch MS; Clary BM; Pappas TN; Tyler DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):581-8. PubMed ID: 15150064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Administration of secretin (RG1068) increases the sensitivity of detection of duct abnormalities by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
Sherman S; Freeman ML; Tarnasky PR; Wilcox CM; Kulkarni A; Aisen AM; Jacoby D; Kozarek RA
Gastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 147(3):646-654.e2. PubMed ID: 24906040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
