These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18426197)

  • 41. Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein-ligand docking with PLANTS.
    Korb O; Stützle T; Exner TE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19125657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
    Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 5. Force-field-based prediction of binding affinities of ligands to proteins.
    Englebienne P; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Nov; 49(11):2564-71. PubMed ID: 19928836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A scoring function for docking ligands to low-resolution protein structures.
    Bindewald E; Skolnick J
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Mar; 26(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 15651033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Novel, customizable scoring functions, parameterized using N-PLS, for structure-based drug discovery.
    Catana C; Stouten PF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17238252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein binding sites.
    Gottschalk KE; Neuvirth H; Schreiber G
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Feb; 17(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 15007163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Nov; 27(15):1866-75. PubMed ID: 16983673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ligand-protein docking using a quantum stochastic tunneling optimization method.
    Mancera RL; Källblad P; Todorov NP
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 15011257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Threading without optimizing weighting factors for scoring function.
    Yang YD; Park C; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 Nov; 73(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 18473394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Blind docking method combining search of low-resolution binding sites with ligand pose refinement by molecular dynamics-based global optimization.
    Vorobjev YN
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Apr; 31(5):1080-92. PubMed ID: 19821514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function.
    Pierce B; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1078-86. PubMed ID: 17373710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. LigDockCSA: protein-ligand docking using conformational space annealing.
    Shin WH; Heo L; Lee J; Ko J; Seok C; Lee J
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Nov; 32(15):3226-32. PubMed ID: 21837636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Drug efficiency indices for improvement of molecular docking scoring functions.
    García-Sosa AT; Hetényi C; Maran U
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Jan; 31(1):174-84. PubMed ID: 19422000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes.
    Springer C; Adalsteinsson H; Young MM; Kegelmeyer PW; Roe DC
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):6821-31. PubMed ID: 16250641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Novel method for generating structure-based pharmacophores using energetic analysis.
    Salam NK; Nuti R; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2356-68. PubMed ID: 19761201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distance dependent scoring function for describing protein-ligand intermolecular interactions.
    Artemenko N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18290639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Alternative to consensus scoring--a new approach toward the qualitative combination of docking algorithms.
    Wolf A; Zimmermann M; Hofmann-Apitius M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):1036-44. PubMed ID: 17492829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Protein docking using surface matching and supervised machine learning.
    Bordner AJ; Gorin AA
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):488-502. PubMed ID: 17444516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.