BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18426296)

  • 1. The dimensionality of the remember-know task: a state-trace analysis.
    Dunn JC
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):426-46. PubMed ID: 18426296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
    Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remember-know: a matter of confidence.
    Dunn JC
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Apr; 111(2):524-42. PubMed ID: 15065921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1025-54. PubMed ID: 20836613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition memory and decision processes: a meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses.
    Gardiner JM; Ramponi C; Richardson-Klavehn A
    Memory; 2002 Mar; 10(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 11798439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007).
    Parks CM; Yonelinas AP
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):188-202; discussion 203-9. PubMed ID: 17227187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remember/Know judgments in cognitive neuroscience: An illustration of the underrepresented point of view.
    Wixted JT
    Learn Mem; 2009 Jul; 16(7):406-12. PubMed ID: 19546229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.
    Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory.
    Higham PA; Vokey JR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):714-44. PubMed ID: 15204130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A single-trace dual-process model of episodic memory: a novel computational account of familiarity and recollection.
    Greve A; Donaldson DI; van Rossum MC
    Hippocampus; 2010 Feb; 20(2):235-51. PubMed ID: 19405130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do changes in the subjective experience of recognition over time suggest independent processes?
    Tunney RJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):43-62. PubMed ID: 19341516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: remembering is faster than knowing.
    Dewhurst SA; Holmes SJ; Brandt KR; Dean GM
    Conscious Cogn; 2006 Mar; 15(1):147-62. PubMed ID: 16019226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).
    Murdock B
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 16802885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing theories of recognition memory by predicting performance across paradigms.
    Smith DG; Duncan MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 15099130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recollection is a continuous process: implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory.
    Mickes L; Wais PE; Wixted JT
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 19320859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deciding about decision models of remember and know judgments: a reply to Murdock (2006).
    Macmillan NA; Rotello CM
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):657-65; discussion 655-6. PubMed ID: 16802886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.
    Rotello CM; Macmillan NA; Reeder JA
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):588-616. PubMed ID: 15250777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Electrophysiological Signature of Remember-Know Is Confounded with Memory Strength and Cannot Be Interpreted as Evidence for Dual-process Theory of Recognition.
    Brezis N; Bronfman ZZ; Yovel G; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 29(2):322-336. PubMed ID: 27991029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.
    Yonelinas AP; Parks CM
    Psychol Bull; 2007 Sep; 133(5):800-32. PubMed ID: 17723031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.