157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18426303)
1. Is the number of trials a primary determinant of conditioned responding?
Gottlieb DA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):185-201. PubMed ID: 18426303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Within-subject effects of number of trials in rat conditioning procedures.
Gottlieb DA; Rescorla RA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):217-31. PubMed ID: 20384402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A short intertrial interval facilitates acquisition of context-conditioned fear and a short retention interval facilitates its expression.
McNally GP; Westbrook RF
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Apr; 32(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 16634659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contextual conditioning with massed versus distributed unconditional stimuli in the absence of explicit conditional stimuli.
Fanselow MS; Tighe TJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Apr; 14(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 3367103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in rat magazine approach.
Gottlieb DA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 16045386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pavlovian conditioning under partial reinforcement: The effects of nonreinforced trials versus cumulative conditioned stimulus duration.
Harris JA; Bouton ME
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):256-272. PubMed ID: 32162948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.
Gunther LM; Miller RR
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of an extinguished CS on competition with another CS.
Bills CH; Dopheide M; Pineño O; Schachtman TR
Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 16457968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolated effects of number of acquisition trials on extinction of rat conditioned approach behavior.
Gottlieb DA; Prince EB
Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 22475497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning.
Murphy RA; Baker AG
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jul; 30(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 15279513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Timing during inhibitory conditioning.
Williams DA; Johns KW; Brindas M
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 18426306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pavlovian conditioning and cumulative reinforcement rate.
Harris JA; Patterson AE; Gharaei S
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Apr; 41(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 25734756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Summation of reinforcement rates when conditioned stimuli are presented in compound.
Andrew BJ; Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21787099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Associative changes with a random CS-US relationship.
Rescorla RA
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 Nov; 53(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 11131789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Perruchet's dissociation between eyeblink conditioned responding and outcome expectancy evidence for two learning systems?
Weidemann G; Tangen JM; Lovibond PF; Mitchell CJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 19364226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping.
Durlach PJ
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Oct; 9(4):374-89. PubMed ID: 6644244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Malleability of conditioned associations: path dependence.
Brown-Su AM; Matzel LD; Gordon EL; Miller RR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Oct; 12(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 3772306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The acquisition of conditioned responding.
Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 21381859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
