BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18426554)

  • 1. Gene Ontology density estimation and discourse analysis for automatic GeneRiF extraction.
    Gobeill J; Tbahriti I; Ehrler F; Mottaz A; Veuthey AL; Ruch P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S9. PubMed ID: 18426554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic assignment of biomedical categories: toward a generic approach.
    Ruch P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 16287934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GeneRIF indexing: sentence selection based on machine learning.
    Jimeno-Yepes AJ; Sticco JC; Mork JG; Aronson AR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 May; 14():171. PubMed ID: 23725347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding GeneRIFs via gene ontology annotations.
    Lu Z; Cohen KB; Hunter L
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():52-63. PubMed ID: 17094227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extraction of semantic biomedical relations from text using conditional random fields.
    Bundschus M; Dejori M; Stetter M; Tresp V; Kriegel HP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9():207. PubMed ID: 18433469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring the evolutionary aspect of the Gene Ontology to enhance predictability and usability.
    Park JC; Kim TE; Park J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S7. PubMed ID: 18426552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying biological concepts from a protein-related corpus with a probabilistic topic model.
    Zheng B; McLean DC; Lu X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():58. PubMed ID: 16466569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using discourse analysis to improve text categorization in MEDLINE.
    Ruch P; Geissbühler A; Gobeill J; Lisacek F; Tbahriti I; Veuthey AL; Aronson AR
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):710-5. PubMed ID: 17911809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic extraction of gene/protein biological functions from biomedical text.
    Koike A; Niwa Y; Takagi T
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1227-36. PubMed ID: 15509601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining evidence, biomedical literature and statistical dependence: new insights for functional annotation of gene sets.
    Aubry M; Monnier A; Chicault C; de Tayrac M; Galibert MD; Burgun A; Mosser J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():241. PubMed ID: 16674810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining hierarchical and associative gene ontology relations with textual evidence in estimating gene and gene product similarity.
    Sanfilippo A; Posse C; Gopalan B; Riensche R; Beagley N; Baddeley B; Tratz S; Gregory M
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2007 Mar; 6(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17393850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data-poor categorization and passage retrieval for gene ontology annotation in Swiss-Prot.
    Ehrler F; Geissbühler A; Jimeno A; Ruch P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S23. PubMed ID: 15960836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic extension of Gene Ontology with flexible identification of candidate terms.
    Lee JB; Kim JJ; Park JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of disease named entity recognition on a corpus of annotated sentences.
    Jimeno A; Jimenez-Ruiz E; Lee V; Gaudan S; Berlanga R; Rebholz-Schuhmann D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3. PubMed ID: 18426548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New challenges for text mining: mapping between text and manually curated pathways.
    Oda K; Kim JD; Ohta T; Okanohara D; Matsuzaki T; Tateisi Y; Tsujii J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5. PubMed ID: 18426550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic information extraction for computerized clinical guideline.
    Zhu H; Ni Y; Cai P; Cao F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1023. PubMed ID: 23920797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A quantitative model for linking two disparate sets of articles in MEDLINE.
    Torvik VI; Smalheiser NR
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1658-65. PubMed ID: 17463015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating relevance ranking strategies for MEDLINE retrieval.
    Lu Z; Kim W; Wilbur WJ
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():439. PubMed ID: 18998778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward automatic recognition of high quality clinical evidence.
    Kilicoglu H; Demner-Fushman D; Rindflesch TC; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():368. PubMed ID: 18998881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. POSBIOTM-NER: a trainable biomedical named-entity recognition system.
    Song Y; Kim E; Lee GG; Yi BK
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2794-6. PubMed ID: 15814561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.