357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18427306)
41. The effect of parallax on intraoperative positioning of the Charité artificial disc.
Petilon J; Hardenbrook M; Sukovich W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 18679098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine.
Su BW; Kim PD; Cha TD; Lee J; April EW; Weidenbaum M; Vaccaro AR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1355-62. PubMed ID: 19478655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Wright T; Abjornson C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Lumbar plexus anatomy within the psoas muscle: implications for the transpsoas lateral approach to the L4-L5 disc.
Davis TT; Bae HW; Mok JM; Rasouli A; Delamarter RB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Aug; 93(16):1482-7. PubMed ID: 22204003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques.
Bresnahan L; Ogden AT; Natarajan RN; Fessler RG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19127157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Anatomy of the posterolateral disc region.
Jaskwhich D; Zimlich R; Glaser J
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1996 Sep; 25(9):628-30. PubMed ID: 8886202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Anatomic evaluation and relationship between the lumbar pedicle and adjacent neural structures: an anatomic study.
Söyüncü Y; Yildirim FB; Sekban H; Ozdemir H; Akyildiz F; Sindel M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Jun; 18(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15905768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of pressure effects on adjacent disk levels after 2-level lumbar constructs: fusion, hybrid, and total disk replacement.
Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Mukherjee DP; Ogden A; Khan Z; Kerr EJ; Cavanaugh DA
Surg Neurol; 2008 Sep; 70(3):247-51; discussion 251. PubMed ID: 18617238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dermatome variation of lumbosacral nerve roots in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae.
Kim YH; Lee PB; Lee CJ; Lee SC; Kim YC; Huh J
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1279-83, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Adapting innovative motion-preserving technology to spinal surgical practice: what should we expect to happen?
Polly DW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S104-9. PubMed ID: 14560181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The ProDisc artificial disc: insertion technique.
Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):651-6, vii. PubMed ID: 16326288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty.
Kurtz SM; van Ooij A; Ross R; de Waal Malefijt J; Peloza J; Ciccarelli L; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 17197327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Anatomical study of preganglionic spinal nerve and disc relation at different lumbar levels: Special aspect for microscopic spine surgery.
Teske W; Boudelal R; Zirke S; von Schulze Pellengahr C; Wiese M; Lahner M
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 26409723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Lumbar spinal arthroplasty: analysis of one center's twenty best and twenty worst clinical outcomes.
Guyer RD; Siddiqui S; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD; Blumenthal SL; Sachs BL; Hochschuler SH; Rashbaum RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2566-9. PubMed ID: 18941428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Regarding the possibility of anterior vascular injury from the posterior approach to the lumbar disc space: an anatomical study.
Ganesan C; Petrus L; Ross IB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):E1371-5. PubMed ID: 22781009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Rapid atrophy of the lumbar multifidus follows experimental disc or nerve root injury.
Hodges P; Holm AK; Hansson T; Holm S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2926-33. PubMed ID: 17139223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Lumbosacral intrathecal nerve roots: an anatomical study.
Arslan M; Cömert A; Açar Hİ; Özdemir M; Elhan A; Tekdemir İ; Tubbs RS; Attar A; Uğur HÇ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2011 Jul; 153(7):1435-42. PubMed ID: 21448688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Nerve root sleeve diameters at normal segments and at segments with proximate disc disease: MRI evaluation.
Gorbachova TA; Terk MR
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Sep; 31(9):511-5. PubMed ID: 12195503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Anatomy of L4 to S3 nerve roots.
Waikakul S; Chandraphak S; Sangthongsil P
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Dec; 18(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 21187550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up.
Park CK; Ryu KS; Jee WH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1755-61. PubMed ID: 18580548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
