250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18427359)
1. Shaping outcomes using two Ni-Ti rotary instruments in simulated canals.
Giovannone T; Migliau G; Bedini R; Ferrari M; Gallottini L
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Apr; 57(4):143-54. PubMed ID: 18427359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):742-7. PubMed ID: 9487850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
Thompson SA; Dummer PM
J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2009 May; 35(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 19410086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the shaping ability of four Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals].
Duan YY; Hu N; Jiang Z; Xiao XM; Su Q
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Jun; 21(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22885487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
