These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18427900)

  • 1. Artifacts found during quality assurance testing of computed radiography and digital radiography detectors.
    Honey ID; Mackenzie A
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Aug; 22(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18427900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed radiography image artifacts revisited.
    Shetty CM; Barthur A; Kambadakone A; Narayanan N; Kv R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):W37-47. PubMed ID: 21178029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
    Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an automated grid artifact detection system for quality control in digital mammography.
    MacLellan CJ; Layman RR; Geiser W; Gress DA; Jones AK
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3442-3450. PubMed ID: 31116445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme.
    Monnin P; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):459-62. PubMed ID: 20395413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them?
    Ayyala RS; Chorlton M; Behrman RH; Kornguth PJ; Slanetz PJ
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(7):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 19001654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grid artifact reduction for direct digital radiography detectors based on rotated stationary grids with homomorphic filtering.
    Kim DS; Lee S
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061905. PubMed ID: 23718596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pictorial Review of Digital Radiography Artifacts.
    Walz-Flannigan AI; Brossoit KJ; Magnuson DJ; Schueler BA
    Radiographics; 2018; 38(3):833-846. PubMed ID: 29676963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of artifacts caused by orthopedic hardware in the spine in spectral detector CT examinations using virtual monoenergetic image reconstructions and metal-artifact-reduction algorithms.
    Große Hokamp N; Neuhaus V; Abdullayev N; Laukamp K; Lennartz S; Mpotsaris A; Borggrefe J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 28932962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acquisition hardware for digital imaging.
    Widmer WR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(1 Suppl 1):S2-8. PubMed ID: 18283979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT.
    Prell D; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3881-95. PubMed ID: 19491452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of grid artifacts formation and elimination in computed radiographic images.
    Lin CY; Lee WJ; Chen SJ; Tsai CH; Lee JH; Chang CH; Ching YT
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 16763931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External validation and transfer learning of convolutional neural networks for computed tomography dental artifact classification.
    Welch ML; McIntosh C; Traverso A; Wee L; Purdie TG; Dekker A; Haibe-Kains B; Jaffray DA
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(3):035017. PubMed ID: 31851961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-energy CT with virtual monochromatic images and metal artifact reduction software for reducing metallic dental artifacts.
    Cha J; Kim HJ; Kim ST; Kim YK; Kim HY; Park GM
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1312-1319. PubMed ID: 28273739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scatter estimation and removal of anti-scatter grid-line artifacts from anthropomorphic head phantom images taken with a high resolution image detector.
    Rana R; Jain A; Shankar A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2016 Feb; 9783():. PubMed ID: 28649162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.