These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18428578)

  • 1. Counting cells in sectioned material: a suite of techniques, tools, and tips.
    Williams RW; von Bartheld CS; Rosen GD
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2003 Nov; Chapter 1():Unit 1.11. PubMed ID: 18428578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential tissue shrinkage and compression in the z-axis: implications for optical disector counting in vibratome-, plastic- and cryosections.
    Gardella D; Hatton WJ; Rind HB; Rosen GD; von Bartheld CS
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 12648764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of the chick embryo: calibration of the optical disector counting method reveals systematic bias.
    Hatton WJ; von Bartheld CS
    J Comp Neurol; 1999 Jun; 409(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 10379913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thick methacrylate sections devoid of lost caps simplify stereological quantifications based on the optical fractionator design.
    Hasselholt S; Lykkesfeldt J; Overgaard Larsen J
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 Dec; 298(12):2141-50. PubMed ID: 26370738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New strategies for embedding, orientation and sectioning of small brain specimens enable direct correlation to MR-images, brain atlases, or use of unbiased stereology.
    Bjarkam CR; Pedersen M; Sørensen JC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2001 Jul; 108(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 11478974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two distinct events, section compression and loss of particles ("lost caps"), contribute to z-axis distortion and bias in optical disector counting.
    Baryshnikova LM; Von Bohlen Und Halbach O; Kaplan S; Von Bartheld CS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Sep; 69(9):738-56. PubMed ID: 16845675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and validity of the physical disector method for estimating neuron number.
    Popken GJ; Farel PB
    J Neurobiol; 1996 Oct; 31(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 8885198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical disector counting in cryosections and vibratome sections underestimates particle numbers: effects of tissue quality.
    Ward TS; Rosen GD; von Bartheld CS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2008 Jan; 71(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 17868132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basic neuroanatomical methods.
    Gerfen CR
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2003 Aug; Chapter 1():Unit 1.1. PubMed ID: 18428576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating cell number in the central nervous system by stereological methods: the optical disector and fractionator.
    Charleston JS
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001; Chapter 12():Unit12.6. PubMed ID: 23045035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A new embedding material for morphometry: Shiojirin E-10].
    Shibata M; Suzuki M; Goto N
    Kaibogaku Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 71(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 9214201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A brief update on physical and optical disector applications and sectioning-staining methods in neuroscience.
    Yurt KK; Kivrak EG; Altun G; Mohamed H; Ali F; Gasmalla HE; Kaplan S
    J Chem Neuroanat; 2018 Nov; 93():16-29. PubMed ID: 29496551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On counting and counting errors.
    Guillery RW
    J Comp Neurol; 2002 May; 447(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11967890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the physical disector method provide an accurate estimation of sensory neuron number in rat dorsal root ganglia?
    Delaloye S; Kraftsik R; Kuntzer T; Barakat-Walter I
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jan; 176(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 18824026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modified Golgi staining protocol for use in the human brain stem and cerebellum.
    Friedland DR; Los JG; Ryugo DK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jan; 150(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 16081162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lost caps in histological counting methods.
    Hedreen JC
    Anat Rec; 1998 Mar; 250(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 9517853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of frozen sections to determine neuronal number in the murine hippocampus and neocortex using the optical disector and optical fractionator.
    Bonthius DJ; McKim R; Koele L; Harb H; Karacay B; Mahoney J; Pantazis NJ
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2004 Nov; 14(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 15519951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Counting particles in tissue sections: choices of methods and importance of calibration to minimize biases.
    von Bartheld C
    Histol Histopathol; 2002 Apr; 17(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 11962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of differential shrinkage in frozen brain sections and its implications for the use of guard zones in stereology.
    Carlo CN; Stevens CF
    J Comp Neurol; 2011 Oct; 519(14):2803-10. PubMed ID: 21491430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of methods for counting cells in the mouse glomerulus.
    Basgen JM; Nicholas SB; Mauer M; Rozen S; Nyengaard JR
    Nephron Exp Nephrol; 2006; 103(4):e139-48. PubMed ID: 16636586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.