These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18428646)

  • 1. Assessment of cochlear function in mice: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Martin GK; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2006 Feb; Chapter 8():Unit8.21C. PubMed ID: 18428646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea--long term experiments in awake guinea pigs.
    Emmerich E; Richter F; Reinhold U; Linss V; Linss W
    Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 148(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 10978821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?
    Liberman MC; Zuo J; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1649-55. PubMed ID: 15478431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of inner and outer hair cell lesions on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Reyes S; Ding D; Sun W; Salvi R
    Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 158(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 11506946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporary and permanent noise-induced changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Vázquez AE; Luebke AE; Martin GK; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 156(1-2):31-43. PubMed ID: 11377880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency specificity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions produced by high-level tones despite inefficient cochlear electromechanical feedback.
    Carvalho S; Mom T; Gilain L; Avan P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1639-48. PubMed ID: 15478430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CD1 hearing-impaired mice. I: Distortion product otoacoustic emission levels, cochlear function and morphology.
    Le Calvez S; Avan P; Gilain L; Romand R
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):37-50. PubMed ID: 9667429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Arnold DJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10037289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise on the intensity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Nagy AL; Tóth F; Vajtai R; Gingl Z; Jóri J; Kiss JG
    Int Tinnitus J; 2002; 8(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 14763217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microphonic and DPOAE measurements suggest a micromechanical mechanism for the 'bounce' phenomenon following low-frequency tones.
    Kirk DL; Moleirinho A; Patuzzi RB
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):69-86. PubMed ID: 9367230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of short-term tone exposure on DPOAEs].
    Shi Y; Jiang S; Gu R
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Feb; 32(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10743127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.
    Dreisbach LE; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2456-69. PubMed ID: 11757935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to assess middle ear transducers in rhesus monkeys.
    Park JY; Coticchia JM; Clark WW; Esselman GH; Khosla S; Neely JG; Fredrickson JM
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 8588662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of kainic acid on the cochlear potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla.
    Zheng XY; Wang J; Salvi RJ; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 95(1-2):161-7. PubMed ID: 8793517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: a time domain analysis.
    Duifhuis H
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):340-6. PubMed ID: 17065827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.