These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18430675)

  • 1. Developing more desirable products for stroke survivors.
    Stehle C; Albrecht-Buehler C
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 18430675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of an eating aid - from the user needs to a product.
    Lindborg AL; Lindén M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 211():191-8. PubMed ID: 25980868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design of a cafeteria tray for use by stroke survivors.
    Adetiba Y; Kolodner B; Kubacki K; Park A
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 18430683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroke rehabilitation: assistive technology devices and environmental modifications following primary rehabilitation in hospital--a therapeutic perspective.
    Sørensen HV; Lendal S; Schultz-Larsen K; Uhrskov T
    Assist Technol; 2003; 15(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 14760980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Future AAC technology needs: consumer perspectives.
    Blackstone SW; Williams MB; Joyce M
    Assist Technol; 2002; 14(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 12739846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a one-handed nail clipper for stroke survivors.
    Carhart C; Ciechowski R; Groat D; Stevans A
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 18430684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit.
    Smith RO; Scherer MJ; Cooper R; Bell D; Hobbs DA; Pettersson C; Seymour N; Borg J; Johnson MJ; Lane JP; Sujatha S; Rao P; Obiedat QM; MacLachlan M; Bauer S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Jul; 13(5):473-485. PubMed ID: 29873268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users.
    Nasr N; Leon B; Mountain G; Nijenhuis SM; Prange G; Sale P; Amirabdollahian F
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Nov; 11(8):653-60. PubMed ID: 25879304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices.
    Batavia AI; Hammer GS
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(4):425-36. PubMed ID: 2089152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing consumer profiles of 'ideal' assistive technologies in ten categories: an integration of quantitative and qualitative methods.
    Scherer MJ; Lane JP
    Disabil Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 19(12):528-35. PubMed ID: 9442991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing a personalised self-management system for post stroke rehabilitation; utilising a user-centred design methodology.
    Mawson S; Nasr N; Parker J; Zheng H; Davies R; Mountain G
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Nov; 9(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 24131371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The user testing toolset: a decision support system to aid the evaluation of assistive technology products.
    Woodcock A; Fielden S; Bartlett R
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():1381-6. PubMed ID: 22316911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Knee Nook.
    Black C; Liu D; Petrash H; Warga G
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 18430682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new design approach of user-centered design on a personal assistive bathing device for hemiplegia.
    Ma MY; Wu FG; Chang RH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 29(14):1077-89. PubMed ID: 17612994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 17234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The provision of feedback through computer-based technology to promote self-managed post-stroke rehabilitation in the home.
    Parker J; Mawson S; Mountain G; Nasr N; Davies R; Zheng H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Nov; 9(6):529-38. PubMed ID: 24131369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of persons with a disability in the design process.
    Peterson W
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2008; 15(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 18430672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Getting it "right": how collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology.
    Johnston P; Currie LM; Drynan D; Stainton T; Jongbloed L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Sep; 9(5):421-31. PubMed ID: 24649888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crucial design issues for special access technology; a Delphi study.
    O'Rourke P; Ekins R; Timmins B; Timmins F; Long S; Coyle E
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jan; 9(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 23786359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology transfer of brain-computer interfaces as assistive technology: barriers and opportunities.
    Nijboer F
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 58(1):35-38. PubMed ID: 25595535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.