BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18430717)

  • 1. Evaluation of exposure parameters in plain radiography: a comparative study with European guidelines.
    Lança L; Silva A; Alves E; Serranheira F; Correia M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18430717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient dose, image quality and radiographic techniques for common X ray examinations in two Greek hospitals and comparison with European guidelines.
    Papadimitriou D; Perris A; Molfetas MG; Panagiotakis N; Manetou A; Tsourouflis G; Vassileva J; Chronopoulos P; Karapanagiotou O; Kottou S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11468804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique.
    Brennan PC; Johnston D
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Mar; 75(891):243-8. PubMed ID: 11932218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals.
    Johnston DA; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):396-402. PubMed ID: 10844865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
    Bogucarskis K; Salmins A; Gfirtner H; Anatschkowa E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Average radiation exposure values for three diagnostic radiographic examinations.
    Rueter FG; Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Suleiman OH
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 2217766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European guidelines on radiographic image quality in chiropractic practice - proposal of a cross-sectional graded classification reporting principle.
    Doktor K; Vilholm ML; Hardardóttir A; Christensen HW; Lauritsen J
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2021 May; 29(1):19. PubMed ID: 34039379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A survey of radiation doses to adults from diagnostic radiology in Victoria.
    Cardillo I; Boal TJ; Hedt JC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Jun; 22(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 10474977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
    Havukainen R; Pirinen M
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
    Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality and dose in lumbar spine examinations: results of a 5 year quality control programme following the European quality criteria trial.
    Vañó E; Oliete S; González L; Guibelalde E; Velasco A; Fernández JM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Dec; 68(816):1332-35. PubMed ID: 8777594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local reference dose evaluation in conventional radiography examinations in Iran.
    Shirin Shandiz M; Bahreyni Toosi MT; Farsi S; Yaghobi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4550. PubMed ID: 24710442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.
    Almén A; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Besjakov J; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Nov; 73(875):1192-9. PubMed ID: 11144797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality control--patient doses--guidance dose levels from diagnostic radiology in Tunisia].
    Ben Omrane L; Chahed N; Hammou A; Mtimet S
    Tunis Med; 2007 Jun; 85(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 17644898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Check of compliance with quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in quality control].
    Ropolo R; Isoardi P; Catuzzo P; Bianchi SD; Bradac GB; Cammarota T; Davini O; De Lucchi R; Gandini G
    Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 11360757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimisation of patient dose for the horizontal beam technique in lateral lumbar spine radiographic examinations.
    Davis AT; Hopkins SA
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130053. PubMed ID: 23652542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool?
    Doherty P; O'Leary D; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1992-9. PubMed ID: 12942300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of skin entrance doses (SEDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in India and proposed diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).
    Sonawane AU; Shirva VK; Pradhan AS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Feb; 138(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19864328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.