These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49. PROPOSALS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR RADIOGRAPHY FOR ADULT PATIENTS BASED ON REGIONAL DOSE SURVEYS IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Vodovatov AV; Balonov MI; Golikov VY; Shatsky IG; Chipiga LA; Bernhardsson C Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 173(1-3):223-232. PubMed ID: 27885093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Radiation exposure in whole body and cranial CT studies in relation to parameters of the examination technic]. Fiebach BJ; Ewen K; Makoski HB Computertomographie; 1983 Sep; 3(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 6640578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania. Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [How strongly does the radiation burden of diagnostic x-ray studies depend on the imaging technic?]. Mini R Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 2552534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Dose-area product measurements in paediatric radiography. McDonald S; Martin CJ; Darragh CL; Graham DT Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):318-25. PubMed ID: 8665131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A prospective evaluation of the role for intraoperative x-ray in lumbar discectomy. Predictors of incorrect level exposure. Ammerman JM; Ammerman MD; Dambrosia J; Ammerman BJ Surg Neurol; 2006 Nov; 66(5):470-3; discussion 473-4. PubMed ID: 17084188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends survey of abdomen and lumbosacral spine radiography. Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Suleiman OH Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 15220497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Collective effective dose from diagnostic radiology in Ukraine. Stadnyk L; Shalopa O; Nosyk O Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):146-9. PubMed ID: 25848100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs. Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Evaluation of effective doses received by patients, during selected types of diagnostic radiation, in Wrocław]. Demczuk P; Jankowski J Med Pr; 1998; 49(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 9695064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]