114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18430838)
1. CT of pediatric vascular stents used to treat congenital heart disease.
Eichhorn JG; Jourdan C; Hill SL; Raman SV; Cheatham JP; Long FR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1241-6. PubMed ID: 18430838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of multidetector CT imaging to assess vascular stents in children with congenital heart disease: an in vivo and in vitro study.
Eichhorn JG; Long FR; Jourdan C; Heverhagen JT; Hill SL; Raman SV; Cheatham JP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Oct; 72(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 18814228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.
Maintz D; Tombach B; Juergens KU; Weigel S; Heindel W; Fischbach R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1319-22. PubMed ID: 12388521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of in-stent stenosis in small children with congenital heart disease using multi-detector computed tomography: a validation study.
Eichhorn JG; Long FR; Hill SL; O'Donovan J; Chisolm JL; Fernandez SA; Cheatham JP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jul; 68(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 16764005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of coronary stent in vitro on multislice computed tomography angiography: improved in-stent visibility by the use of 140-kV tube voltage.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kuwahara S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Kawasaki T; Konno K; Kozuma K; Isshiki T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):414-21. PubMed ID: 17538289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptibility and quantification of in-stent stenosis with six peripheral arterial stent types in vitro: comparison of 16-MDCT angiography, 64-MDCT angiography, and MR angiography.
Schernthaner MB; Edelhauser G; Berzaczy D; Schernthaner R; Wolf F; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1346-51. PubMed ID: 20410424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique.
Maintz D; Seifarth H; Flohr T; Krämer S; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Invest Radiol; 2003 Dec; 38(12):790-5. PubMed ID: 14627897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro.
Blum MB; Schmook M; Schernthaner R; Edelhauser G; Puchner S; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 17954666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of coronary stents in vitro with CT angiography: effect of stent diameter, convolution kernel, and vessel orientation to the z-axis.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Kuwahara S; Yokoyama N; Suzuki M; Isshiki T
Circ J; 2005 Sep; 69(9):1124-31. PubMed ID: 16127198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stent Lumen Visibility in Single-energy CT Angiography: Does Tube Potential Matter?
Boos J; Kröpil P; Lanzman RS; Aissa J; Schleich C; Antoch G; Thomas C
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):752-9. PubMed ID: 27161829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience.
Seifarth H; Ozgün M; Raupach R; Flohr T; Heindel W; Fischbach R; Maintz D
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jan; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 16355036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: an in vitro study.
Sirineni GK; Kalra MK; Pottala K; Waldrop S; Syed M; Tigges S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Apr; 23(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 16821123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multislice CT angiography of the iliac arteries in the presence of various stents: in vitro evaluation of artifacts and lumen visibility.
Maintz D; Fischbach R; Juergens KU; Allkemper T; Wessling J; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):699-704. PubMed ID: 11753140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control.
Oncel D; Oncel G; Tastan A; Tamci B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18562725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.
Schlosser T; Scheuermann T; Ulzheimer S; Mohrs OK; Kühling M; Albrecht PE; Voigtländer T; Barkhausen J; Schmermund A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2007 Dec; 96(12):883-90. PubMed ID: 17694381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.
Lettau M; Kotter E; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 41(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 24411522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of aortocoronary bypass stents with cardiac MDCT compared with conventional catheter angiography.
Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken AH; Das M; Blindt R; Hohl C; Wildberger JE; Günther RW; Kühl HP; Koos R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 17242243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vitro Comparison of Second- and Third-generation Dual-source CT for Coronary Stent Visualization at Different Tube Potentials.
Gassenmaier T; Petri N; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Petritsch B; Voelker W; Bley TA
Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):961-8. PubMed ID: 27236611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coronary stent assessment on multidetector computed tomography: source and predictors of image distortion.
Halon DA; Gaspar T; Adawi S; Peled N; Lewis BS
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17707094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
