These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18431574)
1. Clinical impact of the use of additional ultrasonography in diagnostic breast imaging. Vercauteren LD; Kessels AG; van der Weijden T; Koster D; Severens JL; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K Eur Radiol; 2008 Oct; 18(10):2076-84. PubMed ID: 18431574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer: Updated screening guidelines - much ado about small improvements. Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 26718110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between guideline adherence and clinical outcome for patients referred for diagnostic breast imaging. Vercauteren LD; Kessels AG; van der Weijden T; Severens JL; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K Qual Saf Health Care; 2010 Dec; 19(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 20551187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of clinical information on diagnostic performance in breast sonography. Baek SE; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Youk JH; Lee HJ; Son EJ J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1349-56. PubMed ID: 19778881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer guidelines in action. Redman S; Reeve TS Med J Aust; 2000 Mar; 172(5):196-7. PubMed ID: 10776386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography. Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K; AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of imaging for staging of early-stage breast cancer in two integrated health care systems: adherence with a choosing wisely recommendation. Hahn EE; Tang T; Lee JS; Munoz-Plaza C; Adesina JO; Shen E; Rowley B; Maeda JL; Mosen DM; Ruckdeschel JC; Gould MK J Oncol Pract; 2015 May; 11(3):e320-8. PubMed ID: 25901056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns. Onega T; Haas JS; Bitton A; Brackett C; Weiss J; Goodrich M; Harris K; Pyle S; Tosteson AN Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jan; 23(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28141929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses. Skaane P; Engedal K; Skjennald A Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):497-502. PubMed ID: 9240666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with palpable mammographically noncalcified breast tumors. Skaane P; Sager EM; Olsen JB; Abdelnoor M; Berger A; Wolff PA; Kullmann G Acta Radiol; 1999 Mar; 40(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10080728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic workup of early-stage breast cancer: can we choose more wisely? Aks R; Peleg Hasson S; Sivan A; Kohen T; Rivo L; Yerushalmi R; Kaufman B; Sonnenblick A; Wolf I Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Oct; 183(3):741-748. PubMed ID: 32728861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current role of bone scan with phosphonates in the follow-up of breast cancer. Maffioli L; Florimonte L; Pagani L; Butti I; Roca I Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():S143-8. PubMed ID: 15088128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk. Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review. Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of substratified combined imaging assessment with mammography and ultrasonography for Chinese women with palpable breast masses. Li J; Xing P; Feng L; Dong H; Jin F; Wu Y; Zheng X Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Apr; 144(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 24519388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is it time to change follow-up recommendations in colorectal cancer? Asensio Martínez E; Gómez González L; Morales Giménez R; Pelegrín Mateo FJ; Fernández Cruz M; Gallego Plazas J Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):163-164. PubMed ID: 31077087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines. Corbelli J; Borrero S; Bonnema R; McNamara M; Kraemer K; Rubio D; Karpov I; McNeil M Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(3):e313-9. PubMed ID: 24794545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: A Danish population-based study. Holm-Rasmussen EV; Jensen MB; Balslev E; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF Eur J Cancer; 2017 Dec; 87():1-9. PubMed ID: 29096155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of adherence to guidelines in breast cancer clinical practice. The Italian experience (AIOM). Barni S; Venturini M; Molino A; Donadio M; Rizzoli S; Maiello E; Gori S Tumori; 2011; 97(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 22158483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]