These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18431948)

  • 1. Walking for health in pregnancy: assessment by indirect calorimetry and accelerometry.
    DiNallo JM; Le Masurier GC; Williams NI; Downs DS
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2008 Mar; 79(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18431948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of the Actical activity monitor for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking.
    Johnson M; Meltz K; Hart K; Schmudlach M; Clarkson L; Borman K
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(8):769-76. PubMed ID: 25356920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical activity pattern and activity energy expenditure in healthy pregnant and non-pregnant Swedish women.
    Löf M
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Dec; 65(12):1295-301. PubMed ID: 21792212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of energy expenditure in children using the RT3 accelerometer.
    Kavouras SA; Sarras SE; Tsekouras YE; Sidossis LS
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jul; 26(9):959-66. PubMed ID: 18569562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-selected exercise intensity of habitual walkers.
    Spelman CC; Pate RR; Macera CA; Ward DS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Oct; 25(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 8231763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy expenditure of walking at different intensities in Brazilian college women.
    Anjos LA; Wahrlich V; Bossan FM; Salies MN; Silva PB
    Clin Nutr; 2008 Feb; 27(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 17981375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accelerometer cut-points derived during over-ground walking in persons with mild, moderate, and severe multiple sclerosis.
    Sandroff BM; Riskin BJ; Agiovlasitis S; Motl RW
    J Neurol Sci; 2014 May; 340(1-2):50-7. PubMed ID: 24635890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy expenditure of pregnant women at rest or walking self-paced.
    Nagy LE; King JC
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1983 Sep; 38(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 6613911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a commercial accelerometer (Tritrac-R3 D) to measure energy expenditure during ambulation.
    Sherman WM; Morris DM; Kirby TE; Petosa RA; Smith BA; Frid DJ; Leenders N
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Jan; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 9506799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.
    Haymes EM; Byrnes WC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry.
    Kumahara H; Schutz Y; Ayabe M; Yoshioka M; Yoshitake Y; Shindo M; Ishii K; Tanaka H
    Br J Nutr; 2004 Feb; 91(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 14756909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of preferred walking speed on treadmill may lead to high oxygen cost on treadmill walking.
    Dal U; Erdogan T; Resitoglu B; Beydagi H
    Gait Posture; 2010 Mar; 31(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 20129785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an activity monitor for use in pregnancy to help reduce excessive gestational weight gain.
    Lemmens PMC; Sartor F; Cox LGE; den Boer SV; Westerink JHDM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jul; 18(1):312. PubMed ID: 30064390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points.
    Santos-Lozano A; Santín-Medeiros F; Cardon G; Torres-Luque G; Bailón R; Bergmeir C; Ruiz JR; Lucia A; Garatachea N
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 34(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 23700330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all.
    Byrne NM; Hills AP; Hunter GR; Weinsier RL; Schutz Y
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Sep; 99(3):1112-9. PubMed ID: 15831804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy Expenditure in Vinyasa Yoga Versus Walking.
    Sherman SA; Rogers RJ; Davis KK; Minster RL; Creasy SA; Mullarkey NC; O'Dell M; Donahue P; Jakicic JM
    J Phys Act Health; 2017 Aug; 14(8):597-605. PubMed ID: 28422589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Walking program of low or vigorous intensity during pregnancy confers an aerobic benefit.
    Ruchat SM; Davenport MH; Giroux I; Hillier M; Batada A; Sopper MM; Hammond JA; Mottola M
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Aug; 33(8):661-6. PubMed ID: 22510805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of neural activation and energy cost during treadmill walking with body weight unloading between frail and healthy older women.
    Thomas EE; Stewart D; Mitchell S; Aiken K; Farina D; Macaluso A
    Gait Posture; 2011 Mar; 33(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 21227696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field testing of physiological responses associated with Nordic Walking.
    Church TS; Earnest CP; Morss GM
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2002 Sep; 73(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 12230336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The physiological responses to walking with and without Power Poles on treadmill exercise.
    Porcari JP; Hendrickson TL; Walter PR; Terry L; Walsko G
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1997 Jun; 68(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 9200250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.