These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18431984)

  • 21. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2015/11 Case of Asiye Genç v. Turkey, 27 January 2015, no. 24109/07 (Second Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2015 Jun; 22(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 26399047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2009/2 case of Renolde v. France, 16 October 2008, no. 5608/05 (fifth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2009 Mar; 16(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 19353915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. European court of human rights. ECHR 2014/16. Case of L.H. v. Latvia, 29 April 2014, no. 52019/07 (fourth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Sep; 21(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 25199403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2003/9 Case of Y.F. v. Turkey, 22 July 2003, no. 24209/9 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2003 Dec; 10(4):389-91. PubMed ID: 15212085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Legal frameworks to prevent harm in-utero.
    Bewley S
    Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 11652958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enforced caesareans.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Apr; (127):21-4. PubMed ID: 16127837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2008/10 Case of D. and others v. the United Kingdom, 12 February 2008, no. 38000/05 (fourth section); decision as to the admissibility.
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2008 Sep; 15(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 19024868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2007/11. Case of Ciorap v. Moldova, 19 June 2007, no. 12066/02 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2007 Dec; 14(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 18431982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The patient, the doctor, the fetus, and the court-compelled Cesarean: why courts should address the question through a bioethical lens.
    Chandis V; Williams T
    Med Law; 2006 Dec; 25(4):729-46. PubMed ID: 17263038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Woman can challenge hospital over forced caesarean.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7100):78. PubMed ID: 11644954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2006/11 case of Devrim Turan v. Turkey, 2 March 2006, no. 879/ 02 (third section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2006 Sep; 13(3):281-2. PubMed ID: 17190354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ECHR 2010/2 Case of Colak and Tsakiridis v. Germany, 5 March 2009, no. 77144/01 and 35493/05 (fifth section). Legal cases.
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2010 Mar; 17(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 20422970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
    Warren MA
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company.
    Wisconsin. Court of Appeals
    North West Rep Second Ser; 1998 Feb; 579():730-9. PubMed ID: 12041174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey.
    Küçük M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 28891358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
    Flannery MT
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.