These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18432448)

  • 1. The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance.
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Thaden R; Vorländer M
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):719-36. PubMed ID: 18432448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types--a laboratory experiment.
    Haka M; Haapakangas A; Keränen J; Hakala J; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Indoor Air; 2009 Dec; 19(6):454-67. PubMed ID: 19702627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined effects of acoustic and visual distraction on cognitive performance and well-being.
    Liebl A; Haller J; Jödicke B; Baumgartner H; Schlittmeier S; Hellbrück J
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 21802069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech rate effects upon intelligibility and acceptability of dysarthric speech.
    Dagenais PA; Brown GR; Moore RE
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16428230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance.
    Venetjoki N; Kaarlela-Tuomaala A; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Ergonomics; 2006 Sep; 49(11):1068-91. PubMed ID: 16950722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating airborne sound insulation in terms of speech intelligibility.
    Park HK; Bradley JS; Gover BN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1458-71. PubMed ID: 18345835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of high-pass and of low-pass filtering upon the intelligibility of speech in white noise.
    Niederjohn RJ; Mliner DG
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jul; 22(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 7187668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of human middle ear muscle contractions on speech intelligibility.
    Cox LC; Greenberg HJ
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 914676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.