These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18433611)

  • 1. Potential solutions for providing standard electrocardiogram recordings from nonstandard recording sites.
    Pahlm O; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 18433611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconstruction of standard 12-lead electrocardiograms from 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded with the Mason-Likar electrode configuration.
    Man SC; Maan AC; Kim E; Draisma HH; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Swenne CA
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18433612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal placement of limb electrodes: a potential solution for acquiring standard electrocardiogram waveforms from monitoring electrode positions.
    Pahlm O; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 18805543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiograms versus paramedic-acquired 12-lead electrocardiograms using Mason-Likar limb lead configuration in patients with chest pain.
    Sejersten M; Pahlm O; Pettersson J; Zhou S; Maynard C; Feldman CL; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jan; 39(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16387044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Jowett NI; Turner AM; Cole A; Jones PA
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Feb; 81(952):122-5. PubMed ID: 15701746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in QRS axis measurements, classification of inferior myocardial infarction, and noise tolerance for 12-lead electrocardiograms acquired from monitoring electrode positions compared to standard locations.
    Welinder A; Wagner GS; Maynard C; Pahlm O
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 20691320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False ST elevation in a modified 12-lead surface electrocardiogram.
    Toosi MS; Sochanski MT
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 18342880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12- and 16-lead electrocardiogram.
    Farrell RM; Syed A; Syed A; Gutterman DD
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 18790505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous comparison of 3 derived 12-lead electrocardiograms with standard electrocardiogram at rest and during percutaneous coronary occlusion.
    Nelwan SP; Kors JA; Crater SW; Meij SH; van Dam TB; Simoons ML; Krucoff MW
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 18433614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of optimal recording sites for limited lead body surface potential mapping in myocardial infarction and left ventricular hypertrophy.
    Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Donnelly MP; Black ND
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 18433618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing the 12-lead electrocardiogram: a data driven approach to locating alternative recording sites.
    Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Kors JA; van Herpen G; Donnelly MP; McCullagh PJ; Black ND
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 17292383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparability of the standing and supine standard electrocardiograms and standing sitting and supine stress electrocardiograms.
    Madias JE
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Apr; 39(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 16580409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardization of reduced and optimal lead sets for continuous electrocardiogram monitoring: where do we stand?
    Drew BJ; Finlay DD
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):458-65. PubMed ID: 18817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On designing and testing transformations for derivation of standard 12-lead/18-lead electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms from reduced sets of predictor leads.
    Horácek BM; Warren JW; Wang JJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 18433613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the 24-lead "standard" electrocardiogram to identify the site of acute coronary occlusion. A review paper.
    Wagner GS; Pahlm-Webb U; Pahlm O
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 18433615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many electrodes and where? A "poldermodel" for electrocardiography.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G
    J Electrocardiol; 2002; 35 Suppl():7-12. PubMed ID: 12539094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electrocardiographic differences between standard 12-lead recording and modifications in exercise testing].
    Marín JA; Roldán D
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1991; 61(6):593-6. PubMed ID: 1793312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple measure to control for variations in chest electrodes placement in serial electrocardiogram recordings.
    Soliman EZ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):378-9. PubMed ID: 18620704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pseudo myocardial injury patterns because of nonstandard electrocardiogram electrode placement.
    Drew BJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 18353344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic conclusions from the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram as compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in children.
    Welinder A; Feild DQ; Liebman J; Maynard C; Wagner GS; Wettrell G; Pahlm O
    Am Heart J; 2006 May; 151(5):1059-64. PubMed ID: 16644336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.