These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18433802)

  • 1. Estimating the variation in S phase duration from flow cytometric histograms.
    Larsson S; Ryden T; Holst U; Oredsson S; Johansson M
    Math Biosci; 2008 May; 213(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 18433802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the distribution of the G(2) phase duration from flow cytometric histograms.
    Larsson S; Ryden T; Holst U; Oredsson S; Johansson M
    Math Biosci; 2008 Jan; 211(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 17942127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the total rate of DNA replication using branching processes.
    Larsson S; Rydén T; Holst U; Oredsson S; Johansson M
    Bull Math Biol; 2008 Nov; 70(8):2177-94. PubMed ID: 18818973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer.
    Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
    Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 9056743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of DNA synthesis rate of cultured cells from flow cytometric data.
    Bertuzzi A; Gandolfi A; Germani A; Spanò M; Starace G; Vitelli R
    Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):619-28. PubMed ID: 6518937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method to estimate cell cycle time and growth fraction using bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry data from a single sample.
    Eidukevicius R; Characiejus D; Janavicius R; Kazlauskaite N; Pasukoniene V; Mauricas M; Den Otter W
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Sep; 5():122. PubMed ID: 16176590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Markov model approach shows a large variation in the length of S phase in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.
    Larsson S; Johansson M; Oredsson S; Holst U
    Cytometry A; 2005 May; 65(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 15809992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical evaluation of cell kinetic data from DNA flow cytometry (FCM) by the EM algorithm.
    Baldetorp B; Dalberg M; Holst U; Lindgren G
    Cytometry; 1989 Nov; 10(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 2582959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mathematical methods in flow cytometry: the problem of evaluating DNA histograms of partially synchronous cell populations].
    Schmidt W; Langen P; Graetz H; Lehmann W
    Acta Biol Med Ger; 1982; 41(9):787-99. PubMed ID: 7164698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From flow cytometric BrdUrd data to cell population growth and doubling time.
    Torricelli A; Bisiach M; Spinelli L; Ubezio P
    Cytometry; 1997 Nov; 29(3):222-32. PubMed ID: 9389439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved DNA flow cytometric, DNA ploidy, and S-phase reproducibility between 15 laboratories in analysis of breast cancer using generalized guidelines.
    Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Fernö M; Stål O
    Cytometry A; 2003 Nov; 56(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 14566933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control study by the French Cytometry Association on flow cytometric DNA content and S-phase fraction (S%). The Association Française de Cytométrie.
    D'hautcourt JL; Spyratos F; Chassevent A
    Cytometry; 1996 Mar; 26(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 8809478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinetic heterogeneity of an experimental tumour revealed by BrdUrd incorporation and mathematical modelling.
    Bertuzzi A; Faretta M; Gandolfi A; Sinisgalli C; Starace G; Valoti G; Ubezio P
    Bull Math Biol; 2002 Mar; 64(2):355-84. PubMed ID: 11926121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of resolution reduction on data analysis.
    Hunsberger B; Bagwell CB; Herbert D; Bray C; Langweiler M
    Cytometry A; 2003 Jun; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12766972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the flow [corrected] cytometric data obtained from unperturbed human tumour cell lines: parameter fitting and comparison.
    Basse B; Baguley BC; Marshall ES; Wake GC; Wall DJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2005 Jul; 67(4):815-30. PubMed ID: 15893554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic analysis of flow cytometric DNA histograms from irradiated mouse male germ cells.
    Lampariello F; Mauro F; Uccelli R; Spanò M
    Cytometry; 1989 Jan; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 2645097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A stochastic model for cell debris in flow cytometry.
    Bruni C; Ferrante L; Koch G; Scoglio C; Starace G
    J Theor Biol; 1993 Mar; 161(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 8331948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A general mathematical framework to model generation structure in a population of asynchronously dividing cells.
    León K; Faro J; Carneiro J
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Aug; 229(4):455-76. PubMed ID: 15246784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the life-span of oligodendrocytes from clonal data on their development in cell culture.
    Hyrien O; Mayer-Pröschel M; Noble M; Yakovlev A
    Math Biosci; 2005 Feb; 193(2):255-74. PubMed ID: 15748733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stochastic modelling of apoptosis kinetics.
    Fennell DA; Pallaska A; Corbo M; Cotter FE
    Apoptosis; 2005 Mar; 10(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 15843905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.