These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1843475)

  • 1. Perceptibility of condylar displacement through transcranial radiographs and split-cast technique on dry skull.
    Lombardi M; Preti G; Tomasinelli A; Debernardi C
    Cranio; 1991 Jan; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 1843475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of condylar position change on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and Sectograph zonogram images.
    Ludlow J; Gilbert DB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9082008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of digital subtraction of transcranial plain films in quantification of positional changes of the mandibular condyle.
    Tyndall DA; Phillips C; Malone-Trahey A; Renner J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):748-55. PubMed ID: 2062527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of condylar position changes: a test of validity of posteroanterior cephalometric and 20-degree lateral cephalometric techniques enhanced by digital subtraction.
    Gilbert DB; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Bailey L; Phillips C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 7751763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical evaluation of the lateral temporomandibular joint radiograph.
    Weinberg LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 May; 51(5):676-85. PubMed ID: 6587091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for quantifying positional change of the condyle on lateral tomograms by means of digital subtraction.
    Sato H; Ohki M; Kitamori H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 9687118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of condylar position from temporomandibular joint radiographs.
    Aquilino SA; Matteson SR; Holland GA; Phillips C
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jan; 53(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 3856026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle.
    Ekberg EC; Petersson A; Nilner M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9780901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing condylar changes with digital subtraction radiography.
    Kapa SF; Tyndall DA; Zullo TG; Bagnell CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Feb; 75(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8426725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: a comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms.
    Pullinger A; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Sep; 60(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 3862048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: a comparative study.
    Knoernschild KL; Aquilino SA; Ruprecht A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 1774686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is orthopantomography reliable for TMJ diagnosis? An experimental study on a dry skull.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    J Orofac Pain; 1995; 9(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 8995908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image enhancement of the mandibular condyle through digital subtraction.
    Southard TE; Harris EF; Walter RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Nov; 64(5):645-7. PubMed ID: 3313155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the multiphasic dysfunction profile with lateral transcranial radiographs.
    Rieder CE; Martinoff JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):572-80. PubMed ID: 6594516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of quantification of mandibular condyle displacement in digitally subtracted linear tomograms.
    Ludlow JB; Soltmann R; Tyndall D; Grady JJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 1397462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative condylar position by sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without bone graft.
    Kang MG; Yun KI; Kim CH; Park JU
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2058-64. PubMed ID: 20728029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term changes of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Alder ME; Deahl ST; Matteson SR; Van Sickels JE; Tiner BD; Rugh JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Feb; 87(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 10052369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inclination of the condylar long axis is not related to temporomandibular disc displacement.
    Amorim MY; Alves MGO; Almeida JD; Montesinos GAP; Costa ALF; Lopes SLPC
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12375. PubMed ID: 30474234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significance of condylar positions in patients with temporomandibular disorders.
    Bean LR; Thomas CA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Jan; 114(1):76-7. PubMed ID: 3468172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.