These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18434928)

  • 1. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic.
    Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
    Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term assessment after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge device.
    Schmuziger N; Schimmann F; àWengen D; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 16436987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
    Linder T; Schlegel C; DeMin N; van der Westhuizen S
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.
    Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Vibrant Soundbridge System: a new kind of hearing aid for sensorineural hearing loss. 1: Function and initial clinical experiences].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Mack KF; Battmer RD; Gnadeberg D
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 May; 77(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 9644671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
    Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Pok SM; Schlögel M; Böheim K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 69():51-58. PubMed ID: 20610914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.
    Colletti V; Soli SD; Carner M; Colletti L
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):600-8. PubMed ID: 17062502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The floating mass transducer of the Vibrant Soundbridge interposed between the stapes and tympanic membrane after incus necrosis.
    Cremers CW; Verhaegen VJ; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 18957899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of different vibrant soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing AIDS.
    Todt I; Seidl RO; Gross M; Ernst A
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Sep; 23(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 12218618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.