These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18434928)

  • 21. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
    Gunduz B; Atas A; Bayazıt YA; Goksu N; Gokdogan C; Tutar H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.
    Colletti V; Soli SD; Carner M; Colletti L
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):600-8. PubMed ID: 17062502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The floating mass transducer of the Vibrant Soundbridge interposed between the stapes and tympanic membrane after incus necrosis.
    Cremers CW; Verhaegen VJ; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 18957899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of different vibrant soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing AIDS.
    Todt I; Seidl RO; Gross M; Ernst A
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Sep; 23(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 12218618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Phase 1 clinical trial results of the Envoy System: a totally implantable middle ear device for sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chen DA; Backous DD; Arriaga MA; Garvin R; Kobylek D; Littman T; Walgren S; Lura D
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Dec; 131(6):904-16. PubMed ID: 15577788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Otologics middle ear transducer with contralateral conventional hearing aid in severe sensorineural hearing loss: evolution during the first 24 months.
    Tringali S; Perrot X; Berger P; Granade GL; Dubreuil C; Truy E
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun; 31(4):630-6. PubMed ID: 20418795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ["Vibrant Soundbridge" middle ear implant for auditory rehabilitation in sensory hearing loss. I. Clinical aspects, indications and initial results].
    Dazert S; Shehata-Dieler WE; Dieler R; Helms J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Aug; 79(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 11006909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Newman CW; Sandridge SA; Wodzisz LM
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19034196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant.
    Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Fameree MH; Jamart J; Gersdorff M
    B-ENT; 2005; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant in mixed hearing loss. Indications, techniques, results.
    Dumon T; Gratacap B; Firmin F; Vincent R; Pialoux R; Casse B; Firmin B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 19813468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Baha system in patients with single-sided deafness and contralateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Van Ess MJ; Alameda J; Ortega C; Modisett M; Pinsky K
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Apr; 142(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 20304277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.