These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1843494)

  • 1. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants.
    Teerlinck J; Quirynen M; Darius P; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 1843494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical state assessment of the implant-bone continuum: a better understanding of the Periotest method.
    Tricio J; Laohapand P; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 7615316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability.
    Olivé J; Aparicio C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 2094658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobility assessment with the Periotest system in relation to histologic findings of oral implants.
    Isidor F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 9638008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report.
    Aparicio C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Apr; 17(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 9497709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability.
    Meredith N; Friberg B; Sennerby L; Aparicio C
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 9728122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest.
    Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11831235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
    Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants.
    Engel E; Gomez-Roman G; Axmann-Krcmar D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 12066640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
    Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective study to assess osseointegration of dental endosseous implants with the Periotest instrument.
    Drago CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 10874804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the implant master cast by means of the Periotest method.
    May KB; Curtis A; Wang RF
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10635155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial.
    Zix J; Hug S; Kessler-Liechti G; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 18700378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants.
    Jemt T; Chai J; Harnett J; Heath MR; Hutton JE; Johns RB; McKenna S; McNamara DC; van Steenberghe D; Taylor R; Watson RM; Herrmann I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 8752550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone density: its influence on implant stability after uncovering.
    Morris HE; Ochi S; Crum P; Orenstein I; Plezia R
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(6):263-9. PubMed ID: 14719574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible.
    Røynesdal AK; Amundrud B; Hannaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11324212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems.
    Faulkner MG; Giannitsios D; Lipsett AW; Wolfaardt JF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 11515995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of threaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed in the posterior mandible in support of fixed prostheses.
    Buchs AU; Hahn J; Vassos DM
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9081576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.