These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1843494)

  • 21. [Factors involved in endosseous implant function].
    Niedermeier W; Küblbeck K
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):589-94. PubMed ID: 1817937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
    Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Studies on the effects of abutment position on the prognosis of endosseous implants].
    Scheller H; Wichmann M; Tschernitschek H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):675-7. PubMed ID: 1817860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
    Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of splinting procedures on the periodontal and peri-implant tissue damping characteristics. A longitudinal study with the Periotest device.
    Naert IE; Rosenberg D; van Steenberghe D; Tricio JA; Nys M
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Sep; 22(9):703-8. PubMed ID: 7593701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tissue-integrated prosthesis complications.
    Tolman DE; Laney WR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 1299643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Testing progressive loading of endosteal implants with the Periotest: a pilot study.
    Rotter BE; Blackwell R; Dalton G
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 9151614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Periotest method for determining implant success.
    Van Scotter DE; Wilson CJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 1813649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Damping characteristics of bone-to-implant interfaces. A clinical study with the Periotest device.
    van Steenberghe D; Tricio J; Naert I; Nys M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Mar; 6(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 7669865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part I: Examiner reliability and repeatability of readings. Dental Implant Clinical Group (Planning Committee).
    Manz MC; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Implant Dent; 1992; 1(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1288806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of implant mobility at second-stage surgery with the Periotest: DICRG Interim Report No. 3. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.
    Truhlar RS; Morris HF; Ochi S; Winkler S
    Implant Dent; 1994; 3(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 7749399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reactions of peri-implant tissues to continuous loading of osseointegrated implants.
    Akin-Nergiz N; Nergiz I; Schulz A; Arpak N; Niedermeier W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Sep; 114(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 9743134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examination of the damping behavior of IMZ implants.
    Haas R; Saba M; Mensdorff-Pouilly N; Mailath G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 7672841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors related to Periotest values in endosseal implants: a 9-year follow-up.
    Salonen MA; Raustia AM; Kainulainen V; Oikarinen KS
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 24(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 9144051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The use of the Periotest method for the clinical assessment of the efficacy of dental implantation].
    Matveeva AI; Gvetadze RSh; Loginov VE
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1999; 78(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 10368602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospective study of a large sample.
    Noguerol B; Muñoz R; Mesa F; de Dios Luna J; O'Valle F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 16907779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of implant type, material, coating, diameter, and length on periotest values at second-stage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 4. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group.
    Ochi S; Morris HF; Winkler S
    Implant Dent; 1994; 3(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 7749400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.