117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18435195)
1. Class I gap-formation in highly-viscous glass-ionomer restorations: delayed vs immediate polishing.
Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 18435195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root-surface gap-formation with RMGIC restorations minimized by reduced P/L ratio of the first increment and delayed polishing.
Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 16225915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of spherical silica additions on marginal gaps and compressive strength of experimental glass-ionomer cements.
Irie M; Nagaoka N; Tamada Y; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Minagi S; Finger WJ
Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 22165460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10823073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage.
Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 14698768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of delayed polishing on gap formation of cervical restorations.
Irie M; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11817470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of Class V restorations.
Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 14531601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of N-vinylpyrrolidone (NVP) containing polyelectrolytes on surface properties of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GIC).
Moshaverinia A; Roohpour N; Ansari S; Moshaverinia M; Schricker S; Darr JA; Rehman IU
Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1240-7. PubMed ID: 19556000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
