765 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18436185)
21. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis.
Deurloo EE; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ; Besnard AP; Muller SH; Gilhuijs KG
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Jul; 41(10):1393-401. PubMed ID: 15913987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population?
Arazi-Kleinman T; Causer PA; Jong RA; Hill K; Warner E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Dec; 64(12):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19913125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated by mastectomy.
Tan JC; McCready DR; Easson AM; Leong WL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):638-45. PubMed ID: 17103256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Time from diagnosis to definitive operative treatment of operable breast cancer in the era of multimodal imaging.
Hulvat M; Sandalow N; Rademaker A; Helenowski I; Hansen NM
Surgery; 2010 Oct; 148(4):746-50; discussion 750-1. PubMed ID: 20708761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Consensus Meeting of Course Directors in Breast Imaging, 9 May 2009, in Frankfurt am Main - Topic: Masses].
Müller-Schimpfle MP; Heindel W; Kettritz U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bick U
Rofo; 2010 Aug; 182(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 20544579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer?
Ozaki S; Tozaki M; Fukuma E; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Sakamoto N; Higa K; Abe S; Ogawa T; Tsunoda Y; Nobuhito K
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 18317885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does Preoperative MRI Workup Affect Mastectomy Rates and/or Re-excision Rates in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Carcinoma? A Retrospective Review.
Patel BK; Shah NA; Galgano SJ; Newell M; Wang Z; Chen Z; D'Orsi CJ
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 26387498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens.
Behjatnia B; Sim J; Bassett LW; Moatamed NA; Apple SK
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2010 Feb; 3(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 20224728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is there a role for MRI in the preoperative assessment of patients with DCIS?
Allen LR; Lago-Toro CE; Hughes JH; Careaga E; Brown AT; Chernick M; Barrio AV; Frazier TG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):2395-400. PubMed ID: 20217259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best?
McGhan LJ; Wasif N; Gray RJ; Giurescu ME; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Ocal IT; Stucky CC; Pockaj BA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17 Suppl 3():255-62. PubMed ID: 20853043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of MRI on the treatment of DCIS.
Chung A; Saouaf R; Scharre K; Phillips E
Am Surg; 2005 Sep; 71(9):705-10. PubMed ID: 16468502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ.
Solin LJ; Orel SG; Hwang WT; Harris EE; Schnall MD
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 18202414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and single-stage surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Munot K; Dall B; Achuthan R; Parkin G; Lane S; Horgan K
Br J Surg; 2002 Oct; 89(10):1296-301. PubMed ID: 12296901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in predicting infiltrating residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy in stage II-III breast cancer.
Guarneri V; Pecchi A; Piacentini F; Barbieri E; Dieci MV; Ficarra G; Tazzioli G; Frassoldati A; Battista R; Canossi B; Mauri C; D'Amico R; Conte P; Torricelli P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2150-7. PubMed ID: 21301969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Limited value and utility of breast MRI in patients undergoing breast-conserving cancer surgery.
Shin HC; Han W; Moon HG; Yom CK; Ahn SK; You JM; Kim JS; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Noh DY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):2572-9. PubMed ID: 22446897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Increased ipsilateral whole breast vascularity as measured by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer.
Wright H; Listinsky J; Quinn C; Rim A; Crowe J; Kim J
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):576-9. PubMed ID: 16164924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.
Fancellu A; Soro D; Castiglia P; Marras V; Melis M; Cottu P; Cherchi A; Spanu A; Mulas S; Pusceddu C; Simbula L; Meloni GB
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 24321101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
