These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18436271)

  • 1. A field study on the validity of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique.
    Mangan DJ; Armitage TE; Adams GC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):17-23; discussion 24-31. PubMed ID: 18436271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated zone comparison polygraph technique accuracy with scoring algorithms.
    Gordon NJ; Mohamed FB; Faro SH; Platek SM; Ahmad H; Williams JM
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Feb; 87(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 16343562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge.
    Gamer M; Rill HG; Vossel G; Gödert HW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 16005091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tonic arousal during field polygraph tests in guilty vs. innocent suspects in Japan.
    Hira S; Furumitsu I
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19499326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy rate of lie-detection in China: estimate the validity of CQT on field cases.
    Mao YY; Liang YD; Hu ZQ
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():104-10. PubMed ID: 25447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison question polygraph test: a contrast of methods and scoring.
    Honts CR; Reavy R
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 143():15-26. PubMed ID: 25703188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
    Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations.
    Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Krapohl DJ; Ryan AH
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 15584845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests.
    Elaad E; Ginton A; Jungman N
    J Appl Psychol; 1992 Oct; 77(5):757-67. PubMed ID: 1429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Salience of Guilty Knowledge Test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes.
    Jokinen A; Santtila P; Ravaja N; Puttonen S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 16766070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The (f)utility of post-conviction polygraph testing.
    Rosky JW
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Jun; 25(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 22915203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of field and laboratory polygraphs in the detection of deception.
    Patrick CJ; Iacono WG
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Nov; 28(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 1816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of two types of control questions and two question formats on the outcomes of polygraph examinations.
    Horvath F; Palmatier JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 18554232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?
    Simpson JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 19092066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparison question test: does it work and if so how?
    Offe H; Offe S
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):291-303. PubMed ID: 17123156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Good intentions that fail to cope with the main point in CQT: a comment on Palmatier and Rovner (2015).
    Ginton A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jan; 95(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 25264350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews.
    Horvath F; Jayne B; Buckley J
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 May; 39(3):793-807. PubMed ID: 8006624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios.
    Mertens R; Allen JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 17995914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.