These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18436299)

  • 41. Energy dissipation capacities of CAD-CAM restorative materials: A comparative evaluation of resilience and toughness.
    Niem T; Youssef N; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30017162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Correlations between fracture load of zirconia implant supported single crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement.
    Rohr N; Märtin S; Fischer J
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):222-228. PubMed ID: 29176305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mechanical properties of the dentinoenamel junction: AFM studies of nanohardness, elastic modulus, and fracture.
    Marshall GW; Balooch M; Gallagher RR; Gansky SA; Marshall SJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Jan; 54(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 11077406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
    Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Studies on fracture toughness of dental ceramics.
    Taira M; Nomura Y; Wakasa K; Yamaki M; Matsui A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 17(6):551-63. PubMed ID: 2283550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Nonlinear visco-elastic finite element analysis of porcelain veneers: a submodelling approach to strain and stress distributions in adhesive and resin cement.
    Perillo L; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Quaranta A; Gherlone E; Zarone F; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Oct; 12(5):403-13. PubMed ID: 20157681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel.
    Cura C; Saraçoglu A; Cötert HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 12690353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy.
    Ramp MH; Suzuki S; Cox CF; Lacefield WR; Koth DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 9151273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns.
    Lawn BR; Pajares A; Zhang Y; Deng Y; Polack MA; Lloyd IK; Rekow ED; Thompson VP
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jun; 25(14):2885-92. PubMed ID: 14962567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mechanical behavior of conceptual posterior dental crowns with functional elasticity gradient.
    Penteado MM; Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AM; Ausiello P; Zarone F; Garcia-Godoy F; Borges AL
    Am J Dent; 2019 Aug; 32(4):165-168. PubMed ID: 31436935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Apparent fracture toughness of metal ceramic restorations with different manipulative variables.
    Rosenstiel SF; Porter SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 2654363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mapping the mechanical gradient of human dentin-enamel-junction at different intratooth locations.
    Wang Z; Wang K; Xu W; Gong X; Zhang F
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 29137807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Plastic damage induced fracture behaviors of dental ceramic layer structures subjected to monotonic load.
    Wang R; Lu C; Arola D; Zhang D
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Aug; 22(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 23551817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fracture strength of minimally prepared all-ceramic CEREC crowns after simulating 5 years of service.
    Skouridou N; Pollington S; Rosentritt M; Tsitrou E
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):e70-7. PubMed ID: 23618556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of adding silver nanoparticles on the toughening of dental porcelain.
    Uno M; Kurachi M; Wakamatsu N; Doi Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 23566605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Structure-property relations and crack resistance at the bovine dentin-enamel junction.
    Lin CP; Douglas WH
    J Dent Res; 1994 May; 73(5):1072-8. PubMed ID: 8006234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fracture toughness (KIc) of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis.
    Scherrer SS; Kelly JR; Quinn GD; Xu K
    Dent Mater; 1999 Sep; 15(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 10863431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fracture resistance of human enamel and three all-ceramic crown systems on extracted teeth.
    Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG; Belser UC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 9171497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.