220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18436369)
21. [Dynamic assessment of contrast medium enhancement in Doppler ultrasound imaging. Current status].
Huber S; Delorme S; Zuna I
Radiologe; 1998 May; 38(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 9646345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Vascularization of breast tumors: use of ultrasound contrast medium in evaluating tumor entity. Preliminary results].
Stuhrmann M; Aronius R; Roefke C; Schietzel M
Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 9819647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications.
Sehgal CM; Arger PH; Rowling SE; Conant EF; Reynolds C; Patton JA
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Jul; 19(7):427-40; quiz 441-2. PubMed ID: 10898296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of breast ultrasound.
Sehgal CM; Weinstein SP; Arger PH; Conant EF
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia; 2006 Apr; 11(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 17082996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound characteristics in hypervascular breast tumors: comparison with MRI.
Alamo L; Fischer U
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(6):970-7. PubMed ID: 11419173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.
Park AY; Kwon M; Woo OH; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Song SE; Lee JH; Cha J; Son GS; Seo BK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):759-772. PubMed ID: 30993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Scar or recurrence--comparison of MRI and color-coded ultrasound with echo signal amplifiers].
Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Krämer S; Lell M; Bautz W
Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1395-401. PubMed ID: 12424666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Novel Technique to Obtain Histopathologic Information of Microvessel Density.
Mori N; Mugikura S; Takahashi S; Ito K; Takasawa C; Li L; Miyashita M; Kasajima A; Mori Y; Ishida T; Kodama T; Takase K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):607-614. PubMed ID: 28041744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience.
Moon WK; Im JG; Noh DY; Han MC
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 11012451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast cancer angiogenesis: a quantitative morphologic and Doppler imaging study.
Lee WJ; Chu JS; Houng SJ; Chung MF; Wang SM; Chen KM
Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 May; 2(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 7543800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tumor vascularity of breast lesions: potentials and limits of contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography.
Stuhrmann M; Aronius R; Schietzel M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Dec; 175(6):1585-9. PubMed ID: 11090380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic value of signal-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in space-occupying lesions of the skin and skin appendages].
Schröder RJ; Mäurer J; Hidajat N; Zlowodski M; Schlums D; Weber S; Hosten N; Felix R
Rofo; 1999 Sep; 171(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 10520331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Solid Breast Masses.
Diao X; Zhan J; Chen L; Chen Y; Cao H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(6):e786-e793. PubMed ID: 32863154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 3-D color Doppler image quantification of breast masses.
Carson PL; Fowlkes JB; Roubidoux MA; Moskalik AP; Govil A; Normolle D; LeCarpentier G; Nattakom S; Helvie M; Rubin JM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 24(7):945-52. PubMed ID: 9809628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Color Doppler ultrasound determination of the differential structure of breast tumors].
Peters-Engl C; Medl M; Leodolter S
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 7527258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Doppler sonography in breast pathology.
Steyaert L
JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun; 83(3):121-2. PubMed ID: 11025923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A method for assessing the microvasculature in a murine tumor model using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Loveless ME; Li X; Huamani J; Lyshchik A; Dawant B; Hallahan D; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1699-709. PubMed ID: 19022995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound score and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis: correlation with biological factors.
Jia WR; Chai WM; Tang L; Wang Y; Fei XC; Han BS; Chen M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 24794865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utility of ultrasound Angio-PLUS imaging for detecting blood flow in breast masses and comparison with color Doppler for differentiating benign from malignant masses.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Yadav S; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jun; 64(6):2087-2095. PubMed ID: 36890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: harmonic versus nonharmonic 3D power Doppler imaging.
Hsiao YH; Huang YL; Liang WM; Lin C; Kuo SJ; Chen DR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 19041173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
