These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18436648)

  • 1. Simulation of talking faces in the human brain improves auditory speech recognition.
    von Kriegstein K; Dogan O; Grüter M; Giraud AL; Kell CA; Grüter T; Kleinschmidt A; Kiebel SJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 May; 105(18):6747-52. PubMed ID: 18436648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual face-movement sensitive cortex is relevant for auditory-only speech recognition.
    Riedel P; Ragert P; Schelinski S; Kiebel SJ; von Kriegstein K
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():86-99. PubMed ID: 25650106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional connectivity between face-movement and speech-intelligibility areas during auditory-only speech perception.
    Schall S; von Kriegstein K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86325. PubMed ID: 24466026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual abilities are important for auditory-only speech recognition: evidence from autism spectrum disorder.
    Schelinski S; Riedel P; von Kriegstein K
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():1-11. PubMed ID: 25283605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception.
    Skipper JI; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 15734345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inside Speech: Multisensory and Modality-specific Processing of Tongue and Lip Speech Actions.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Hueber T; Lamalle L; Sato M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 29(3):448-466. PubMed ID: 28139959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.
    Buchan JN; Paré M; Munhall KG
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():162-71. PubMed ID: 18621032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.
    Peelle JE; Sommers MS
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():169-81. PubMed ID: 25890390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early auditory sensory processing of voices is facilitated by visual mechanisms.
    Schall S; Kiebel SJ; Maess B; von Kriegstein K
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():237-45. PubMed ID: 23563227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The timing of visual speech modulates auditory neural processing.
    Sato M
    Brain Lang; 2022 Dec; 235():105196. PubMed ID: 36343508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined predictive effects of sentential and visual constraints in early audiovisual speech processing.
    Solberg Økland H; Todorović A; Lüttke CS; McQueen JM; de Lange FP
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7870. PubMed ID: 31133646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.
    Aruffo C; Shore DI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Feb; 19(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 22033983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms of enhancing visual-speech recognition by prior auditory information.
    Blank H; von Kriegstein K
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():109-18. PubMed ID: 23023154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing communicative facial and vocal cues in the superior temporal sulcus.
    Deen B; Saxe R; Kanwisher N
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117191. PubMed ID: 32711066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal interactions during perception of audiovisual speech and nonspeech signals: an fMRI study.
    Hertrich I; Dietrich S; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 20044895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.