These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18437380)

  • 1. The effect of bone porosity on the shear strength of the bone-cement interface.
    Amirfeyz R; Bannister G
    Int Orthop; 2009 Jun; 33(3):843-6. PubMed ID: 18437380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of fluid penetration and interfacial porosity on the fixation of cemented femoral components.
    Iesaka K; Jaffe WL; Jones CM; Kummer FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Sep; 87(9):1298-302. PubMed ID: 16129762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of application time of two types of bone cement on the cement-bone interface strength.
    Dahabreh Z; Phillips HK; Stewart T; Stone M
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 May; 25(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 25192848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
    Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty.
    van de Groes SA; de Waal Malefijt MC; Verdonschot N
    Knee; 2013 Jun; 20(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22999642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary study of interfacial shear strength between PMMA precoated UHMWPE acetabular cup and PMMA bone cement.
    Park KD; Kim J; Yang SJ; Yao A; Park JB
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2003 May; 65(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 12687720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of preheating of hip prostheses on the stem-cement interface.
    Iesaka K; Jaffe WL; Kummer FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 85(3):421-7. PubMed ID: 12637425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrity of the stem-cement interface in THA: effects of stem surface finish and cement porosity.
    Iesaka K; Jaffe WL; Kummer FJ
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Oct; 87(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18386841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cement compressive strength and porosity on augmentation performance in a model of orthopedic screw pull-out.
    Pujari-Palmer M; Robo C; Persson C; Procter P; Engqvist H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():624-633. PubMed ID: 29100205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of morphological variations of the cortical wall at the bone-cement interface.
    Zhang CL; Shen GQ; Zhu KP; Liu DX
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 11(1):72. PubMed ID: 27369636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed-mode failure strength of implant-cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness.
    Zelle J; Janssen D; Peeters S; Brouwer C; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):780-3. PubMed ID: 21074772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.
    Mann KA; Werner FW; Ayers DC
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10541077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of antibiotic loading on the shear strength at the stem-cement interface (Shear strength of antibiotic loaded cement).
    Kilicoglu O; Koyuncu LO; Ozden VE; Bozdag E; Sunbuloglu E; Yazicioglu O
    Int Orthop; 2008 Aug; 32(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 17356880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue of the cement/bone interface: the surface texture of bone and loosening.
    Arola D; Stoffel KA; Yang DT
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Feb; 76(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16080159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement.
    Majkowski RS; Miles AW; Bannister GC; Perkins J; Taylor GJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1993 May; 75(3):459-63. PubMed ID: 8496223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.
    Liebmann SM; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(5):348-60. PubMed ID: 10546417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.