These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1843797)

  • 21. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
    Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.
    Ozturk Ortan Y; Yurdakuloglu Arslan T; Aydemir B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 21239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent.
    Kao CT; Ding SJ; Wang CK; He H; Chou MY; Huang TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):568.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17110251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
    Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frictional resistance to sliding archwires with repeated displacement.
    Liew CF; Brockhurst P; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 12462683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of Teflon coating on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires.
    Farronato G; Maijer R; Carìa MP; Esposito L; Alberzoni D; Cacciatore G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 21478301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variation in surface topography of different NiTi orthodontic archwires in various commercial fluoride-containing environments.
    Huang HH
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 16417915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
    Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
    Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
    Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Force-deflection properties of initial orthodontic archwires.
    Quintão CC; Cal-Neto JP; Menezes LM; Elias CN
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 19388430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
    Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of interbracket distances on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 17826605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Tselepis M; Brockhurst P; West VC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A; McCabe J; Gordon P
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 7857894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative evaluation of metallurgical properties of stainless steel and TMA archwires with timolium and titanium niobium archwires--an in vitro study.
    Vijayalakshmi RD; Nagachandran KS; Kummi P; Jayakumar P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 20139569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.