These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1843797)

  • 41. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
    Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.
    Jones SP; Amoah KG
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17679533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of artificial saliva on the frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7786865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance.
    Khambay B; Millett D; McHugh S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 15947232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires: an in vitro study.
    Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Hooshmand T; Farazdaghi H; Mehrabi A; Razavi ES
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 24325758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
    Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of different combinations of tip and torque on archwire/bracket friction.
    Hamdan A; Rock P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 18658140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):418-30. PubMed ID: 12940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Frictional resistances of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D friction maps.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 11605870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
    Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
    Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new esthetic fiber-reinforced polymer composite resin archwire: a comparative atomic force microscope (AFM) and field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) study.
    Chng CK; Foong K; Gandedkar NH; Chan YH; Chew CL
    Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 24950433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.
    Albawardi A; Warunek S; Makowka S; Al-Jewair T
    Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100683. PubMed ID: 35995715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.
    Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Friction of conventional and silica-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-wire combinations.
    Cha JY; Kim KS; Hwang CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 17029541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of simulated erosive conditions on the frictional behavior of different orthodontic bracket-wire combinations.
    Stefański T; Kloc-Ptaszna A; Postek-Stefańska L
    Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 31274255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In vitro sliding-driven morphological changes in representative esthetic NiTi archwire surfaces.
    Choi S; Park DJ; Kim KA; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Oct; 78(10):926-34. PubMed ID: 26278620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Friction between archwires of different sizes, cross-section and alloy and brackets ligated with low-friction or conventional ligatures.
    Tecco S; Tetè S; Festa F
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19123711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.