211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18438633)
1. [Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness].
Hager A; Wiegand W
Ophthalmologe; 2008 Sep; 105(9):840-4. PubMed ID: 18438633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.
Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].
Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W
Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in relation to corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in nonglaucomatous eyes.
Mangouritsas G; Mourtzoukos S; Mantzounis A; Alexopoulos L
Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():1071-7. PubMed ID: 21847339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lee J; Lee CH; Choi J; Yoon SY; Sung KR; Park SB; Kook MS
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19337476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness in primary congenital glaucoma.
Jordão ML; Costa VP; Rodrigues Mde L; Paula JS
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 251(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 22555897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
