BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18439045)

  • 21. Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay.
    Romm H; Oestreicher U; Kulka U
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2009; 45(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 19861729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiation Dose Estimation by Automated Cytogenetic Biodosimetry.
    Rogan PK; Li Y; Wilkins RC; Flegal FN; Knoll JH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Dec; 172(1-3):207-217. PubMed ID: 27412514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation.
    Shirley B; Li Y; Knoll JHM; Rogan PK
    J Vis Exp; 2017 Sep; (127):. PubMed ID: 28892030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Construction of dose response calibration curves for dicentrics and micronuclei for X radiation in a Serbian population.
    Pajic J; Rakic B; Jovicic D; Milovanovic A
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Oct; 773():23-8. PubMed ID: 25308702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Dicentric Chromosome Assay.
    Endesfelder D; Oestreicher U; Bucher M; Beinke C; Siebenwirth C; Ainsbury E; Moquet J; Gruel G; Gregoire E; Martinez JS; Vral A; Baeyens A; Valente M; Montoro A; Terzoudi G; Triantopoulou S; Pantelias A; Monteiro Gil O; Prieto MJ; Domene MM; Zafiropoulos D; Barquinero JF; Pujol-Canadell M; Lumniczky K; Hargitai R; Kis E; Testa A; Patrono C; Sommer S; Hristova R; Kostova N; Atanasova M; Sevriukova O; Domínguez I; Pastor N; Güçlü I; Pajic J; Sabatier L; Brochard P; Tichy A; Milanova M; Finot F; Cuceu Petrenci C; Wilkins RC; Beaton-Green LA; Seong KM; Lee Y; Lee YH; Balajee AS; Maznyk N; Sypko T; Pham ND; Tran TM; Miura T; Suto Y; Akiyamam M; Tsuyama N; Abe Y; Goh VST; Chua CEL; Abend M; Port M
    Radiat Res; 2023 Jun; 199(6):556-570. PubMed ID: 37018160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay.
    Beinke C; Barnard S; Boulay-Greene H; De Amicis A; De Sanctis S; Herodin F; Jones A; Kulka U; Lista F; Lloyd D; Martigne P; Moquet J; Oestreicher U; Romm H; Rothkamm K; Valente M; Meineke V; Braselmann H; Abend M
    Radiat Res; 2013 Aug; 180(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 23862730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents.
    Miller SM; Ferrarotto CL; Vlahovich S; Wilkins RC; Boreham DR; Dolling JA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2007 Jul; 83(7):471-7. PubMed ID: 17538797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criticality accident dosimetry by chromosomal analysis.
    Voisin P; Roy L; Hone PA; Edwards AA; Lloyd DC; Stephan G; Romm H; Groer PG; Brame R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):443-7. PubMed ID: 15353688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the accuracy of dose estimates from automatically scored dicentric chromosomes by accounting for chromosome number.
    Endesfelder D; Kulka U; Einbeck J; Oestreicher U
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Dec; 96(12):1571-1584. PubMed ID: 33001765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intercomparison of conventional and QuickScan dicentric scoring for the validation of individual biodosimetry analysis in Taiwan.
    Lin WC; Chang KW; Liao TZ; Ou Yang FY; Chang TJ; Yuan MC; Wilkins RC; Chang CH
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(7):916-925. PubMed ID: 34003708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examining Radiation-Induced In Vivo and In Vitro Gene Expression Changes of the Peripheral Blood in Different Laboratories for Biodosimetry Purposes: First RENEB Gene Expression Study.
    Abend M; Badie C; Quintens R; Kriehuber R; Manning G; Macaeva E; Njima M; Oskamp D; Strunz S; Moertl S; Doucha-Senf S; Dahlke S; Menzel J; Port M
    Radiat Res; 2016 Feb; 185(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 26829612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model.
    Sasaki MS
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Feb; 79(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 12569012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A dose-response curve for biodosimetry from a 6 MV electron linear accelerator.
    Lemos-Pinto MM; Cadena M; Santos N; Fernandes TS; Borges E; Amaral A
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Oct; 48(10):908-14. PubMed ID: 26445334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementation of a dose-response curve for γ-radiation in the Portuguese population by use of the chromosomal aberration assay.
    Martins V; Antunes AC; Monteiro Gil O
    Mutat Res; 2013 Jan; 750(1-2):50-4. PubMed ID: 23043763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. LBDNet interlaboratory comparison for the dicentric chromosome assay by digitized image analysis applying weighted robust statistical methods.
    González Mesa JE; Alem Glison D; Chaves-Campos FA; Ortíz Morales F; Valle Bourrouet L; Abarca Ramírez M; Verdejo V; Di Giorgio M; Radl A; Taja MR; Deminge M; Rada-Tarifa A; Lafuente-Alvarez E; Lima FF; Hwang S; Esposito Mendes M; Mandina-Cardoso T; Muñoz-Velastegui G; Guerrero-Carbajal YC; Arceo Maldonado C; Monjagata N; Aguilar-Coronel S; Espinoza-Zevallos M; Falcon de Vargas A; Vittoria Di Tomaso M; Holladay B; Lima OG; Martínez-López W
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2024 May; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38810111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Establishment of
    Vijayalakshmi J; Chaurasia RK; Srinivas KS; Vijayalakshmi K; Paul SFD; Bhat NN; Sapra BK
    Heliyon; 2023 Jun; 9(6):e17068. PubMed ID: 37484390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biodosimetry using chromosomal translocations measured by FISH in a population chronically exposed to low dose-rate 60Co gamma-irradiation.
    Hsieh WA; Lucas JN; Hwang JJ; Chan CC; Chang WP
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2001 Jul; 77(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 11454280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dicentric chromosome aberration analysis using giemsa and centromere specific fluorescence in-situ hybridization for biological dosimetry: An inter- and intra-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories.
    Bhavani M; Tamizh Selvan G; Kaur H; Adhikari JS; Vijayalakshmi J; Venkatachalam P; Chaudhury NK
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Sep; 92():85-90. PubMed ID: 25014548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Persistence of chromosome aberrations following acute radiation: I, PAINT translocations, dicentrics, rings, fragments, and insertions.
    Tucker JD; Cofield J; Matsumoto K; Ramsey MJ; Freeman DC
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005; 45(2-3):229-48. PubMed ID: 15657915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of chromosome damage for biodosimetry using imaging flow cytometry.
    Beaton LA; Ferrarotto C; Kutzner BC; McNamee JP; Bellier PV; Wilkins RC
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 756(1-2):192-5. PubMed ID: 23618924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.