1602 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18439499)
21. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Bedient CE; Magrina JF; Noble BN; Kho RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 201(6):566.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19683685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].
Benincà G; Garrone C; Rebecchi F; Giaccone C; Morino M
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 12872566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes TL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 20303834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: surgical and survival outcomes.
Fader AN; Michener CM; Frasure HE; Giannios N; Belinson JL; Zanotti KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 19423064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robot-assisted laparoscopic trachelectomy after supracervical hysterectomy.
Nezhat CH; Rogers JD
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):850.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18054926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Muzii L; Basile S; Zupi E; Marconi D; Zullo MA; Manci N; Bellati F; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17848323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.
Huffmanm LC; Pandalai PK; Boulton BJ; James L; Starnes SL; Reed MF; Howington JA; Nussbaum MS
Surgery; 2007 Oct; 142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. PubMed ID: 17950356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robotic assisted partial nephrectomy: one surgeon's initial experience.
DeLong JM; Shapiro O; Moinzadeh A
Can J Urol; 2010 Jun; 17(3):5207-12. PubMed ID: 20566016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted hysterectomy vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.
Göçmen A; Şanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Dec; 8(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 23081780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
