These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18439740)

  • 1. Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts.
    Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 18439740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences.
    Bendixen A; Roeber U; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 19(10):1664-77. PubMed ID: 18271740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies.
    Bendixen A; Prinz W; Horváth J; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jul; 41(3):1111-9. PubMed ID: 18467129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern.
    Sculthorpe LD; Collin CA; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():78-86. PubMed ID: 18674520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced novelty-P3 associated with increased behavioral distractibility in schizophrenia.
    Cortiñas M; Corral MJ; Garrido G; Garolera M; Pajares M; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18450358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation.
    Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 18346043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L; Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features.
    Paavilainen P; Arajärvi P; Takegata R
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jan; 18(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 17301682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention.
    Melara RD; Rao A; Tong Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):279-306. PubMed ID: 11999855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes.
    Yucel G; Petty C; McCarthy G; Belger A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16356321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention.
    Melara RD; Chen S; Wang H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16157478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of auditory selective attention: event-related potential measures of channel selection and target detection.
    Gomes H; Duff M; Barnhardt J; Barrett S; Ritter W
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Sep; 44(5):711-27. PubMed ID: 17608798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary motor area contribution to attentional reorienting after distraction.
    Horváth J; Maess B; Berti S; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 18287943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.
    Reiche M; Hartwigsen G; Widmann A; Saur D; Schröger E; Bendixen A
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():153-60. PubMed ID: 23123705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.