These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18440573)

  • 21. When they see, they see it almost right: normal subjective experience of detected stimuli in spatial neglect.
    Bonneh YS; Sagi D; Gorea A; Soroker N; Treger J; Pavlovskaya M
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 446(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18822347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over human dorsal-lateral posterior parietal cortex disrupts integration of hand position signals into the reach plan.
    Vesia M; Yan X; Henriques DY; Sergio LE; Crawford JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 100(4):2005-14. PubMed ID: 18684904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptation of eye-movements to simulated hemianopia in reading and visual exploration: Transfer or specificity?
    Schuett S; Kentridge RW; Zihl J; Heywood CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1712-20. PubMed ID: 19397866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Unawareness for homonymous visual field defect].
    Ito T; Hirayama K; Yamawaki R; Kondo Y; Sakai S; Kondo T; Yamadori A
    No To Shinkei; 2003 Oct; 55(10):869-77. PubMed ID: 14635515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of rearranged vision on event-related lateralizations of the EEG during pointing.
    Berndt I; Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Gotz KG; Wascher E
    Biol Psychol; 2005 Jan; 68(1):15-39. PubMed ID: 15312693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects.
    Van der Stigchel S; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J; Barton JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2025-36. PubMed ID: 18416675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation.
    Bolognini N; Rasi F; Coccia M; Làdavas E
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2830-42. PubMed ID: 16219672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A mirror in the mind: a case of visual allaesthesia in homonymous hemianopia.
    Kasten E; Poggel DA
    Neurocase; 2006 Apr; 12(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 16714242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual field changes after a rehabilitation intervention: vision restoration therapy.
    Romano JG; Schulz P; Kenkel S; Todd DP
    J Neurol Sci; 2008 Oct; 273(1-2):70-4. PubMed ID: 18672255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perimetric homonymous visual field loss post-stroke.
    Townend BS; Sturm JW; Petsoglou C; O'Leary B; Whyte S; Crimmins D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 14(8):754-6. PubMed ID: 17270447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are hemianopic reading and visual exploration impairments visually elicited? New insights from eye movements in simulated hemianopia.
    Schuett S; Kentridge RW; Zihl J; Heywood CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 19121328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contour-integration deficits on the intact side of the visual field in hemianopia patients.
    Paramei GV; Sabel BA
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 188(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 18077009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets.
    Goble DJ; Brown SH
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):3063-74. PubMed ID: 18436632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli.
    Marzi CA; Mancini F; Metitieri T; Savazzi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1489-95. PubMed ID: 16360710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Visual search training for a case of homonymous field defect with multiple visual dysfunctions].
    Hirayama K; Sakai S; Yamawaki R; Kondo Y; Suzuki T; Fujimoto C; Yamadori A; Mori E
    No To Shinkei; 2004 May; 56(5):403-13. PubMed ID: 15279198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal localization in hemianopia: new insights on multisensory integration.
    Leo F; Bolognini N; Passamonti C; Stein BE; Làdavas E
    Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):855-65. PubMed ID: 18263626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Objective perimetry using functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with visual field loss.
    Furuta A; Nakadomari S; Misaki M; Miyauchi S; Iida T
    Exp Neurol; 2009 Jun; 217(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 19348794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study.
    Reinhard J; Schreiber A; Schiefer U; Kasten E; Sabel BA; Kenkel S; Vonthein R; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 89(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15615742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect.
    Gainotti G; De Luca L; Figliozzi F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 19231479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance.
    Shenton JT; Schwoebel J; Coslett HB
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 370(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15489010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.