These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18440944)

  • 1. A regional audit of kilovoltage X-rays--a single centre approach.
    Burton NL; Brimelow J; Welsh AD
    Br J Radiol; 2008 May; 81(965):422-6. PubMed ID: 18440944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dosimetric intercomparison of kilovoltage X-rays, megavoltage photons and electrons in the Republic of Ireland.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Sheridan ME
    Radiother Oncol; 1998 Jul; 48(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 9756178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dosimetric intercomparison of electron beams in UK radiotherapy centres.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2393-409. PubMed ID: 9434296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10-300 kV generating potential). Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology.
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Dec; 41(12):2605-25. PubMed ID: 8971972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dosimetric intercomparison of megavoltage photon beams in UK radiotherapy centres.
    Thwaites DI; Williams JR; Aird EG; Klevenhagen SC; Williams PC
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Feb; 37(2):445-61. PubMed ID: 1553393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement of kappach factors for application with the IPEMB very low energy dosimetry protocol.
    Perrin BA; Whitehurst P; Cooper P; Hounsell AR
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jul; 46(7):1985-95. PubMed ID: 11474939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kilovoltage x-ray dosimetry--an experimental comparison between different dosimetry protocols.
    Munck af Rosenschöld P; Nilsson P; Knöös T
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4431-42. PubMed ID: 18670053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between absorbed dose to water standards established by water calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB and by application of international air-kerma based protocols for kilovoltage medium energy x-rays.
    Perichon N; Rapp B; Denoziere M; Daures J; Ostrowsky A; Bordy JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2787-806. PubMed ID: 23563051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Hill R; Holloway L; Baldock C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):N331-44. PubMed ID: 16237233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols.
    Peixoto JG; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):563-75. PubMed ID: 10730957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the need for quality assurance in superficial kilovoltage radiotherapy.
    Austerlitz C; Mota H; Gay H; Campos D; Allison R; Sibata C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 18325931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A pragmatic approach to dosimetric audit in radiotherapy.
    Blake SW; Casebow MP
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 75(897):754-62. PubMed ID: 12200245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric audits of photon beams in radiation therapy centres in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    da Rosa LA; Brito RR; Gonçalves M; de Paiva E; Dovales AC; Freire BL; Giannoni RA; Di Prinzio R; Velasco AF; Castelo LH; Oliveira RV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(2):272-5. PubMed ID: 18503063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beam characteristics and radiation output of a kilovoltage cone-beam CT.
    Ding GX; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5231-48. PubMed ID: 20714042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison.
    Johansson KA; Mattsson LO; Svensson H
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6283791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of regional radiotherapy dosimetry audit data and recommendations for future audits.
    Palmer A; Mzenda B; Kearton J; Wills R
    Br J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 84(1004):733-42. PubMed ID: 21159805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calorimetric determination of kQ factors for NE 2561 and NE 2571 ionization chambers in 5 cm x 5 cm and 10 cm x 10 cm radiotherapy beams of 8 MV and 16 MV photons.
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6243-59. PubMed ID: 17921583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Measurements of radiation depth-dose curves of radiotherapy device RTA].
    Vasil'ev VN; Kokontsev AA
    Med Tekh; 1997; (5):11-4. PubMed ID: 9445971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.