BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18441079)

  • 1. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. II. Phenotypic differences.
    Bennett GL; Thallman RM; Snelling WM; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2103-14. PubMed ID: 18441079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season.
    Martin JL; Creighton KW; Musgrave JA; Klopfenstein TJ; Clark RT; Adams DC; Funston RN
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 17965334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beef heifer development within three calving systems.
    Grings EE; Geary TW; Short RE; MacNeil MD
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Aug; 85(8):2048-58. PubMed ID: 17468421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of dam nutrition on growth and reproductive performance of heifer calves.
    Martin JL; Vonnahme KA; Adams DC; Lardy GP; Funston RN
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):841-7. PubMed ID: 17085735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of body measurements and weight on calf size and calving difficulty of Holsteins.
    Sieber M; Freeman AE; Kelley DH
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 Sep; 72(9):2402-10. PubMed ID: 2592650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic (co)variances for calving difficulty score in composite and parental populations of beef cattle: II. Reproductive, skeletal, and carcass traits.
    Bennett GL; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11204715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of inbreeding depression for serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations, body weights, and body weight gains in Angus beef cattle divergently selected for serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration.
    Davis ME; Simmen RC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):552-61. PubMed ID: 19820046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic changes in beef cow traits following selection for calving ease.
    Bennett GL; Thallman RM; Snelling WM; Keele JW; Freetly HC; Kuehn LA
    Transl Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 5(1):txab009. PubMed ID: 33659864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of age on body condition and production parameters of multiparous beef cows.
    Renquist BJ; Oltjen JW; Sainz RD; Calvert CC
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Jul; 84(7):1890-5. PubMed ID: 16775073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment.
    Olson KM; Cassell BG; McAllister AJ; Washburn SP
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Dec; 92(12):6167-75. PubMed ID: 19923620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dystocia in 3-year-old beef heifers; relationship to maternal nutrient intake during early- and mid-gestation, pelvic area and hormonal indicators of placental function.
    Micke GC; Sullivan TM; Rolls PJ; Hasell B; Greer RM; Norman ST; Perry VE
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Apr; 118(2-4):163-70. PubMed ID: 19762178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic aspects of growth of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows from birth to maturity.
    Coffey MP; Hickey J; Brotherstone S
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jan; 89(1):322-9. PubMed ID: 16357296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle.
    Johanson JM; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Nov; 86(11):3745-55. PubMed ID: 14672206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heifer development systems: dry-lot feeding compared with grazing dormant winter forage.
    Funston RN; Larson DM
    J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1595-602. PubMed ID: 21521820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of calving distribution on beef cattle progeny performance.
    Funston RN; Musgrave JA; Meyer TL; Larson DM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5118-21. PubMed ID: 22871928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers.
    Colburn DJ; Deutscher GH; Nielsen MK; Adams DC
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1452-60. PubMed ID: 9250504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
    Enns RM; Nicoll GB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beef x beef and dairy x beef females mated to Angus and Charolais sires. I. Pregnancy rate, dystocia and birth weight.
    Nelson LA; Beavers GD
    J Anim Sci; 1982 Jun; 54(6):1138-49. PubMed ID: 7107532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle.
    Snelling WM; Allan MF; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld T; Smith TP; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM; Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):837-48. PubMed ID: 19966163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.