56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18441342)
1. Automated quantitative dose-response modeling and point of departure determination for large toxicogenomic and high-throughput screening data sets.
Burgoon LD; Zacharewski TR
Toxicol Sci; 2008 Aug; 104(2):412-8. PubMed ID: 18441342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Rat Liver Transcriptomic Point of Departure Predicts a Prospective Liver or Non-liver Apical Point of Departure.
Johnson KJ; Auerbach SS; Costa E
Toxicol Sci; 2020 Jul; 176(1):86-102. PubMed ID: 32384157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrating gene expression and splicing dynamics across dose-response oxidative modulators.
Barutcu AR; Black MB; Samuel R; Slattery S; McMullen PD; Nong A
Front Genet; 2024; 15():1389095. PubMed ID: 38846964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcriptomic point of departure determination: a comparison of distribution-based and gene set-based approaches.
Costa E; Johnson KJ; Walker CA; O'Brien JM
Front Genet; 2024; 15():1374791. PubMed ID: 38784034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxic Dose prediction of Chemical Compounds to Biomarkers using an ANOVA based Gene Expression Analysis.
Hasan MN; Akond Z; Alam MJ; Begum AA; Rahman M; Mollah MNH
Bioinformation; 2018; 14(7):369-377. PubMed ID: 30262974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use cases, best practice and reporting standards for metabolomics in regulatory toxicology.
Viant MR; Ebbels TMD; Beger RD; Ekman DR; Epps DJT; Kamp H; Leonards PEG; Loizou GD; MacRae JI; van Ravenzwaay B; Rocca-Serra P; Salek RM; Walk T; Weber RJM
Nat Commun; 2019 Jul; 10(1):3041. PubMed ID: 31292445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Various Nonlinear Response Surfaces for Mathematical Description of the Type of Combined Toxicity.
Varaksin AN; Panov VG; Katsnelson BA; Minigalieva IA
Dose Response; 2018; 16(4):1559325818816596. PubMed ID: 30574029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmark Dose Modeling of
Guo X; Mei N
Toxicol Res; 2018 Oct; 34(4):303-310. PubMed ID: 30370005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical relationship between metabolic decomposition and chemical uptake predicts bioconcentration factor data for diverse chemical exposures.
Rowland MA; Wear H; Watanabe KH; Gust KA; Mayo ML
BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Aug; 12(1):81. PubMed ID: 30086736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin dose-dependently increases bone mass and decreases marrow adiposity in juvenile mice.
Fader KA; Nault R; Raehtz S; McCabe LR; Zacharewski TR
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 348():85-98. PubMed ID: 29673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-elicited effects on bile acid homeostasis: Alterations in biosynthesis, enterohepatic circulation, and microbial metabolism.
Fader KA; Nault R; Zhang C; Kumagai K; Harkema JR; Zacharewski TR
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5921. PubMed ID: 28725001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for the use of single-chemical transcriptomics data in predicting the hazards associated with complex mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Labib S; Williams A; Kuo B; Yauk CL; White PA; Halappanavar S
Arch Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 91(7):2599-2616. PubMed ID: 27858113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Animal-Free Chemical Safety Assessment.
Loizou GD
Front Pharmacol; 2016; 7():218. PubMed ID: 27493630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Points of Departure for Health Risk Assessment Based on High-Throughput Screening Data.
Sand S; Parham F; Portier CJ; Tice RR; Krewski D
Environ Health Perspect; 2017 Apr; 125(4):623-633. PubMed ID: 27384688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin Alters Lipid Metabolism and Depletes Immune Cell Populations in the Jejunum of C57BL/6 Mice.
Fader KA; Nault R; Ammendolia DA; Harkema JR; Williams KJ; Crawford RB; Kaminski NE; Potter D; Sharratt B; Zacharewski TR
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Dec; 148(2):567-80. PubMed ID: 26377647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative analysis of the relative mutagenicity of five chemical constituents of tobacco smoke in the mouse lymphoma assay.
Guo X; Heflich RH; Dial SL; Richter PA; Moore MM; Mei N
Mutagenesis; 2016 May; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 26001754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RNA-Seq versus oligonucleotide array assessment of dose-dependent TCDD-elicited hepatic gene expression in mice.
Nault R; Fader KA; Zacharewski T
BMC Genomics; 2015 May; 16(1):373. PubMed ID: 25958198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toxicity mechanisms identification via gene set enrichment analysis of time-series toxicogenomics data: impact of time and concentration.
Gao C; Weisman D; Lan J; Gou N; Gu AZ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4618-26. PubMed ID: 25785649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for the next generation of risk science.
Krewski D; Westphal M; Andersen ME; Paoli GM; Chiu WA; Al-Zoughool M; Croteau MC; Burgoon LD; Cote I
Environ Health Perspect; 2014 Aug; 122(8):796-805. PubMed ID: 24727499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. System-based identification of toxicity pathways associated with multi-walled carbon nanotube-induced pathological responses.
Snyder-Talkington BN; Dymacek J; Porter DW; Wolfarth MG; Mercer RR; Pacurari M; Denvir J; Castranova V; Qian Y; Guo NL
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):476-89. PubMed ID: 23845593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]