These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18441758)
21. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies]. Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics. Zander T; Rohlmann A; Klöckner C; Bergmann G Eur Spine J; 2003 Aug; 12(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 12720068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nucleus implant parameters significantly change the compressive stiffness of the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Joshi A; Mehta S; Vresilovic E; Karduna A; Marcolongo M J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 16060361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lumbar total disc replacement impingement sensitivity to disc height distraction, spinal sagittal orientation, implant position, and implant lordosis. Rundell SA; Day JS; Isaza J; Guillory S; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):E590-8. PubMed ID: 22146286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system. Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of increasing implant height on lumbar spine kinematics and foraminal size using the ProDisc-L prosthesis. Gaffey JL; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov ML; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1777-82. PubMed ID: 20700082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis. Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of an auxiliary facet system on intervertebral discs and adjacent facet joints. Charles YP; Lima LV; Persohn S; Rouch P; Steib JP; Skalli W Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1293-300. PubMed ID: 23988459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of a posterior dynamic implant adjacent to a rigid spinal fixator. Zander T; Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Bergmann G Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 16750875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computed tomography assessment of the accuracy of in vivo placement of artificial discs in the lumbar spine including radiographic and clinical consequences. Patel VV; Andrews C; Pradhan BB; Bae HW; Kanim LE; Kropf MA; Delamarter RB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(8):948-53. PubMed ID: 16622387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness. Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Rohlmann A; Neller S; Claes L; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(24):E557-61. PubMed ID: 11740371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement. Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics. Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of a semiconstrained integrated artificial disc on zygapophyseal joint pressure and displacement. Yao Q; Wang JC; Shamie AN; Lord E; Cohen Y; Zheng S; Wei B; Guo Y; Hu W; Yan J; Zhang D; Wang L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(25):E1510-7. PubMed ID: 25271494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Requirements for an artificial intervertebral disc. Eijkelkamp MF; van Donkelaar CC; Veldhuizen AG; van Horn JR; Huyghe JM; Verkerke GJ Int J Artif Organs; 2001 May; 24(5):311-21. PubMed ID: 11420881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]